How can massless strings be the building blocks of matter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the role of massless strings in the construction of massive objects within the framework of string theory. The participant questions the implications of massless strings traveling at the speed of light, comparing them to photons and exploring their stability in forming matter. The conversation highlights the interaction of massless particles with the Higgs field, which provides them with effective mass, suggesting that massless strings could similarly acquire mass through interactions in string theory. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on the nature of strings and their fundamental properties in relation to the standard model of particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory concepts
  • Familiarity with the standard model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of the Higgs field and its role in particle mass
  • Basic principles of relativity and light-speed travel
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of massless particles in string theory
  • Explore the relationship between the Higgs field and mass acquisition in particles
  • Investigate the differences between strings and photons in theoretical physics
  • Study the role of neutrinos in cosmology and their relation to dark matter
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced concepts of string theory, particle physics, and the fundamental nature of matter.

soothsayer
Messages
422
Reaction score
5
To clarify, I'm not confused as to how massless strings can add up to make massive objects, I understand why that happens. My question has more to do with the speed at which strings move. If strings are massless, they must travel at the speed of light, correct? If so, then first off, what is the difference between a string and a photon? Second, how do strings provide enough stability to construct all the massive objects in the universe? I am not moving at the speed of light, nor are the atoms in my body or the electrons and quarks that they are made of, but the strings that make up those quarks and electrons should be, according to relativity. I remember learning that neutrinos were once ruled out as a candidate for dark matter because they were too light and fast to provide the kind of foundation needed for the observed large scale structure of the universe. Why do strings not suffer a similar problem? Is my view of "strings" as tiny, vibrating little strands of energy inaccurate in some way? Any clarification on the subject would be much appreciated. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matter particles of the standard model are also fundamentally massless, but they interact with the Higgs field, and the nonzero energy density of the Higgs field, even in vacuum, gives them an effective mass. An implementation of the standard model within string theory would work in the same way - massless strings which interact with whatever fundamental degree of freedom plays the role of the Higgs, and thereby acquire an effective mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
17K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
26K
  • · Replies 702 ·
24
Replies
702
Views
135K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K