How Can MechEng Undergrads Best Prepare for MatSci Grad Programs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crr14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grad Undergrad
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on how Mechanical Engineering undergraduates can best prepare for graduate programs in Materials Science Engineering. Participants explore the relevance of various undergraduate courses, particularly in chemistry, physics, and mathematics, and their potential impact on graduate school applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the lack of a Materials Science undergraduate program and questions the desirability of a Chemical Engineering background compared to Mechanical Engineering for graduate studies.
  • Another participant, currently in a Materials Science graduate program, suggests that while Chemical Engineering is often mentioned, many students from various backgrounds, including Mechanical Engineering, successfully enter Materials Science programs.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of chemistry in Materials Science, with differing opinions on its relevance; one participant downplays its necessity while acknowledging that it may be important for specific areas like polymer synthesis.
  • Participants discuss the potential benefits of taking physics courses, particularly those related to solid-state physics and semiconductor devices, as being more relevant to Materials Science than some Chemical Engineering courses.
  • One participant inquires about the value of mathematics courses, specifically partial differential equations (PDEs), in preparation for graduate studies, noting their relevance in previous coursework.
  • Another participant agrees that a course in PDEs or general mathematical methods would be beneficial for students entering physics or engineering graduate programs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the importance of chemistry in Materials Science, with no consensus on whether a Chemical Engineering background is more advantageous than a Mechanical Engineering background. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific courses that would be most beneficial for preparation.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the emphasis on chemistry may vary significantly between different Materials Science programs, and the relevance of specific courses may depend on individual research interests within the field.

crr14
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'll be starting my final year of college next fall and am looking at going to graduate school for Material Science Engineering. My school doesn't off a Material Science undergrad program, and it was not what I initially wanted to go into when I started school, so I'm currently studying Mechanical Engineering. It seems like most schools accept either Chemical or Mechanical undergrad degrees, but I've seen in a few threads here where it seems like ChemEng is sometimes the recommended "next best thing" to a MatSci undergrad degree. I'm curious as to what would make a ChemEng program make it more desirable? The chemistry classes? Labs? I've got a quite a few spaces for electives coming up in the next year due to AP/summer transfer credits, and although originally I was thinking of adding a math minor now I'm thinking of taking as many ChemEng electives as possible. I was looking at adding physical chemistry to get some thermodynamics from a different perspective, organic chemistry, the intro unit operations class, and fluid flow/heat transfer for ChemEng's. Would these help my chances at all, or are there other classes you would recommend taking? Maybe statistical mechanics or intro to QM from the physics department? Thanks for any help guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
People come into MatSci grad programs from a lot of different fields, and I definitely know of Mech E's who have done that. I'm not sure why people say ChemEng is better, but as a MatSci grad student (who also did an undergrad) I would say don't worry about the chemistry. MatSci programs vary in focus even among themselves, and some have more of a chemistry emphasis, but many have very little (such as my undergrad program). If you like chemistry, then go for organic if you want, but personally, I don't intend to ever learn much chemistry because I like the physics side of MatSci much more.

Unit operations, I have never even heard of it. Fluid flow is not that important in most MatSci and I doubt many of us know it (I don't know the first thing). Heat transfer could be important in a lot of research situations but MatSci courses won't expect you to have seen much more than the basic heat transfer equations, which I'm sure you have.

In terms of QM/stat mech, I don't think most MatSci undergrad programs require a large amount of that. So I honestly wouldn't worry about being behind there. But I would always recommend going towards the physics classes; it's easier to pick up engineering stuff on the fly than it is to skim a quantum book.

I would say take whichever classes are most interesting to you and relevant to what you think you may want to do with MatSci. If there is a semiconductor device/physics class or solid state, that would be very useful, but again, it's more about where you want to go within the field. EE may have some courses for solid state/devices/processing which would be more useful than ChemEng stuff IMO.
 
Last edited:
Very interesting, thanks for the reply! I'll take a closer look at the physics and EE stuff then, there's an EE class on semiconductors that may be helpful. I guess I was under the impression that there was a chemistry emphasis on some aspects of MatSci? But that might also be because our one MatSci type elective is taught by the ChemEng department.

On another note, any math courses that you wish you would have had going into the MatSci graduate program? I know a math minor isn't necessary for grad school, but I also thought about maybe trying to fit in a PDE's class or something (it seems like PDE's came up quite a bit in my mechanics of materials and fracture classes, but we never spent too much time on solving them).
 
Don't take my word for it on the chemistry, I'm probably biased because it isn't what I do. It's definitely important if you want to do any kind of polymer/organic synthesis, or the biomaterials side of things, etc. There may be large differences in emphasis between programs as well. From my experience though, the solid state/semiconductor stuff is more central.

I think a PDE or general mathematical methods course is useful for basically anyone in physics or engineering graduate school. Can't really go wrong with that. I never had the chance to take one in undergrad.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K