How Can the Cauchy Integral Transform Be Defined to Avoid Singularities?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Transform
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
let be the next linear integral transform:

[tex]g_{k} (x)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dt \frac{f(t)}{(t-x)^{k}}[/tex]

no matter what f(t) is there is a singularity at the points where t=x how could you define it so it's finite avoiding the poles at t=x where k is a positive integer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tpm said:
no matter what f(t) is there is a singularity at the points where t=x

False. When f(t) has a zero of order [itex]\ge k[/itex] in x, i.e. [itex]f(t)=(t-x)^k f_0(t)[/itex], and [itex]f_0(t)\in L^1(0,\infty)[/itex], such integral is well defined.

Another way the integral can be well defined is verified with complex variable and residue theory.
 
Last edited: