How Can the Cosmos Be Both 3 Degrees and Extremely Hot?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the apparent contradiction between the average temperature of the cosmos, which is about 3 degrees Kelvin, and the presence of extremely hot plasma in the universe. The 3K temperature refers to the cosmic microwave background radiation, representing the average temperature of space, while most visible matter, primarily in stars, is indeed very hot. The concept of temperature in empty space is complex, as it can be considered 'undefined' due to the lack of matter. The conversation highlights the nuances of cosmic temperature and the enjoyment of learning physics later in life. Understanding these concepts enriches the appreciation of cosmology.
saberjim
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am taking a course from the Teaching Company called the "Physics of History". Two statements by the teacher seem in conflict to me as an amateur.

1. The average temperature of the cosmos is about 3 degrees K.

2. Most of the material in the cosmos is in the form of plasma which is extremely hot.

I am pretty sure the answer might be difficult to explain to an amateur so a web reference would suffice, Thanks/

Jim Flint



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most material might be hot but nothing was said about HOW MUCH material there is.
 
saberjim said:
1. The average temperature of the cosmos is about 3 degrees K.

2. Most of the material in the cosmos is in the form of plasma which is extremely hot.
Both are sort of correct - I suspect the lecturer wanted to make an amusing point.

The temperature of most of the cosmos is 'undefined' empty space is nothing which can't have a temperature.
The 3K is the temperature of the microwave background which fills the universe. If you like this is the temperature of the walls of the room, nothing in space can cool below this.
But most of the visible matter in space is in stars which are very hot.
 
Thank you for the quick reply. I am an old geezer of 75 and have fallen in love with physics. A little too late for a degree as I already have one in geology but the subject does not soar like cosmology. My wife hit me with the question during the last lesson and will be thrilled with the answer.

We both appreciate your taking time to answer.

Jim Flint
 
It's like the statistics joke:
Everyone has more than the average number of legs !
(Because a very few people have 1 leg, but nobody has more than 2, the average is 1.99999...)

The TTC lectures are very good - enjoy the physics
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top