How can the logarithm problem be solved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a logarithm problem involving conjoined bases, where participants explore different approaches to express logarithmic relationships and clarify notation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various methods to express logarithmic equations, question the assumptions made regarding notation, and seek alternative perspectives on the problem.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the problem statement and notation, with some participants providing insights into logarithmic properties. There is an ongoing exploration of different interpretations without a clear consensus on the approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a lack of clarity in the original problem statement, which has led to confusion regarding the notation used for variables. Participants are encouraged to revisit the textbook for the correct formulation of the question.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
425
Homework Statement
Given that, $$log_p X=5$$ and $$log_p Y=2$$.
Find $$log_{xy} P$$
Relevant Equations
Logs
Interesting, i have not worked on logs with conjoined bases before, anyway my approach is as follows;

$$p^5=x$$ and $$p^2=y$$
Let $$log_{xy}P = m$$, →$$(xy)^m = P$$
$$(P^5⋅P^2)^m = P^1$$
$$P^{7m}=P^1$$
$$m=\frac {1}{7}$$

Any other way of looking at this is most welcome.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As you find
\log_ab \ \log_ba=1
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
\log_{xy}(p) = \frac{\log_p(p)}{\log_p(xy)} = \frac{1}{2 + 5}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
You are, of course, assuming that x = X, y = Y and p = P. Or just being inconsistent in your notation.
 
I have been thinking about this question and my bad:mad:, i did not indicate the letters in the right manner. Find the question below as it appears on the textbook;

1640670828612.png


This implies that, my method was after all correct! Sorry for my lack of details here...
 
mjc123 said:
You are, of course, assuming that x = X, y = Y and p = P. Or just being inconsistent in your notation.
Kindly check my post ##5##...i did not capture the question correctly...My apologies mjc...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K