How Can Trig Double Angle Formulas Simplify This Function?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the function \(\sqrt{2}\sqrt{1-\cos(2\pi(x-y)/n)}\) to the form \(2\sin[(x-y)\pi/n]\) using the double angle formula for cosine. The key transformation involves recognizing that \(\cos(2z) = 1 - 2\sin^2(z)\), which leads to the simplification of the square roots and the removal of the "2" in the cosine argument. The final expression requires taking the absolute value of \(\sin(z)\) to ensure correctness. Additionally, participants emphasize the importance of providing solutions to unanswered homework threads to enhance the forum's knowledge base. The thread highlights the value of visual aids, such as diagrams, in understanding trigonometric identities.
TogoPogo
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello, I am trying to simplify the inputted function here http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sqrt(2)+sqrt(1-cos((2pi(x-y))/n))

which is \sqrt{2}\sqrt{1-cos[2\pi(x-y)/n]}

to the form of 2sin[(x-y)\pi/n]

Homework Equations



Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution



EDIT: nevermind, found the solution... Forgot about double angle formula lolThe part that confused me was how they managed to remove the "2" in the argument of the cosine function, as well as how they removed the square root
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ## z \equiv \pi (x-y) / n ##

From the double-angle identity for cosine, we know that ## \cos{(2z)} = 1 - 2 \sin^{2}{z} ##, so
$$ \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1- \cos{(2z)}} = \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1 - (1 - 2 \sin^{2}{z})} $$
$$ = \sqrt{2} \sqrt{2 \sin^{2}{z}} = 2 \sqrt{\sin^{2}{z}} = 2 | \sin{z} | $$
Note the need for taking the absolute value in the final expression. (The initial expression always has a positive or zero value.)
 
The last poster hit it on the nail.

I recommend to view and understand the proof of trigonometric identities that can be derived from 2 diagrams. The proof is really neat, as it involves using the distance formula 2 times.

Also, when you get an expression that has a lot going on, maybe try to substitute some values with dummy variables.
 
MidgetDwarf said:
The last poster hit it on the nail.

I recommend to view and understand the proof of trigonometric identities that can be derived from 2 diagrams. The proof is really neat, as it involves using the distance formula 2 times.

Also, when you get an expression that has a lot going on, maybe try to substitute some values with dummy variables.

What do you mean by 2 diagrams?
 
Redbelly98 said:
Let ## z \equiv \pi (x-y) / n ##

From the double-angle identity for cosine, we know that ## \cos{(2z)} = 1 - 2 \sin^{2}{z} ##, so
$$ \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1- \cos{(2z)}} = \sqrt{2} \sqrt{1 - (1 - 2 \sin^{2}{z})} $$
$$ = \sqrt{2} \sqrt{2 \sin^{2}{z}} = 2 \sqrt{\sin^{2}{z}} = 2 | \sin{z} | $$
Note the need for taking the absolute value in the final expression. (The initial expression always has a positive or zero value.)
TogoPogo seems to have worked all that out already, nearly five years ago.
 
Math_QED said:
What do you mean by 2 diagrams?

I will take a picture of the diagrams. Should have it posted by Thursday. It just involves 2 units circles.
 
haruspex said:
TogoPogo seems to have worked all that out already, nearly five years ago.
Indeed. But, with no replies and no posted solution, this thread had been placed in the "Open Problems" forum. Greg is encouraging people to post solutions to such threads:
Greg Bernhardt said:
Unanswered homework threads provide no value and can actually harm. Nearly 50% of traffic to PF lands on homework threads. If a guest lands on a thread with no replies it looks poorly and the guest is not helped. PF becomes a knowledge base when a thread is older than a few months.
Also, the answer stated in the OP was not completely correct, in missing the absolute value signs.
 
Redbelly98 said:
Indeed. But, with no replies and no posted solution, this thread had been placed in the "Open Problems" forum. Greg is encouraging people to post solutions to such threads:

Also, the answer stated in the OP was not completely correct, in missing the absolute value signs.
Ok.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K