B How Can We Derive the Relativistic Rocket Equation?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relativistic rocket equation, starting from the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation. It emphasizes the need for a relativistic approach to accurately calculate the mass ratio in terms of velocity and exhaust speed. The conversation includes mathematical derivations involving momentum and energy changes during mass ejection, highlighting the non-conservation of mass in this process. It also introduces the concept of rapidity as a more suitable variable than velocity for relativistic calculations. The final goal is to express velocity as a function of the mass ratio, demonstrating the relationship between rapidity and the rocket's performance at relativistic speeds.
greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
I am studying through online resources some principles of spacecraft propulsion, since it really fascinates me, and makes me want to know a bit more about it :)
For rockets, thruster, I found the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation:
$$\Delta v=v_e ln(\frac{m_0}{m_f})$$

Of course, rockets can travel up to relativistic speeds, thus a relativistic implementation of the RE must be taken into account for a higher degree of accuracy in calculations.
All implementations I found, rely on this equation which gives the mass ratio in terms of ##\Delta v## and exhaust speed ##v_e##... but I couldn't manage to derive it, since in all papers it is given without demonstration:
1622107269789.png


Could you please give me a hint on how to get to this identity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can do it like this. Let ##v## be the velocity of the rocket measured in the initial rest frame of the rocket. At some time ##t##, the rocket has momentum ##p## and energy ##E##. At some later time, after ejecting some amount of mass ##dk##, the rocket has mass ##m+dm##, momentum ##p + dp## and energy ##E + dE##. Note that, unlike energy and momentum, mass is not conserved in this process i.e. ##dm \neq - dk##.

If the speed of the ejected mass ##dk## with respect to the spaceship is ##u##, then its velocity in the initial rest frame is ##\tilde{v}= \dfrac{v-u}{1-uv}##. The ejected mass possesses energy ##-dE## and momentum ##-dp##. The change in momentum of the rocket is ##dp = d(\gamma m v) = \dfrac{-\tilde{v} dk}{\sqrt{1-\tilde{v}^2}}## and the change in energy of the rocket is ##dE = d(\gamma m) = \dfrac{-dk}{\sqrt{1-\tilde{v}^2}}##. Write\begin{align*}
d(\gamma mv) &= \tilde{v} d(\gamma m) = \dfrac{v-u}{1-uv} d(\gamma m) \\
\implies \frac{d(\gamma mv) }{dv} &= \dfrac{v-u}{1-uv} \dfrac{d(\gamma m)}{dv}
\end{align*}Can you solve this differential equation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes JD_PM, vanhees71 and Dale
I think all one has to do is replace normalized velocity ##\beta = v/c## with rapidity, w.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapidity

Rapidities add in SR, while velocities don't. So, v = at becomes w = a##\tau##.

So, for the non-relativistic case we can say
$$m \frac{dv}{dt} = -v_e \frac{dm}{dt} $$
which reduces to
$$dv = v_e \frac{dm}{m}$$
which gives the solution
$$v =v_e ln \frac{m_i}{m_f}$$

Replacing v by the rapidity w gives:
$$dw = \frac{v_e}{c} \frac{dm}{m}$$
and
$$w = \frac{v_e}{c} ln \frac{m_i}{m_f}$$

where
$$w = \frac{1}{2} ln \frac{1+v/c } {1-v/c }$$
and in the limit when v is small, ##w \approx v/c##.

This can be solved to get v as a function of the mass ratio rather than w as a faction of the mass ratio.

Hopefully I didn't make any silly errors, but I won't guarantee it. I wouldn['t be too surprised if I made some error with a factor of c, I usually use geometric units where c=1.
 
It is not so hard from first principles, though. From #2, write\begin{align*}
v \frac{d(\gamma m)}{dv} + \gamma m &= \frac{v-u}{1-uv} \frac{d(\gamma m)}{dv} \\

\gamma m &= \left(\frac{v-u}{1-uv} - v \right) \frac{d(\gamma m)}{dv} \\

\gamma m &= \left(\frac{u(v^2-1)}{1-uv} \right) \frac{d(\gamma m)}{dv} \\ \\

\int_{v_1}^{v_2} dv \frac{(1-uv)}{u(v^2-1)} &= \int_{\gamma_1 m_1}^{\gamma_2 m_2} \frac{d(\gamma m)}{\gamma m} \\

\frac{-1}{u} \int_{v_1}^{v_2} dv \frac{1}{1-v^2} - \int_{v_1}^{v_2} dv \frac{v}{v^2-1} &= \int_{\gamma_1 m_1}^{\gamma_2 m_2} \frac{d(\gamma m)}{\gamma m} \\ \\

\frac{-1}{u} \left[ \mathrm{artanh}(v) \right]_{v_1}^{v_2} - \frac{1}{2} \ln{ \left| \frac{v_2^2-1}{v_1^2-1} \right|} &= \ln \left( \frac{\gamma_2 m_2}{\gamma_1 m_1} \right)

\end{align*}Because ##v_1, v_2 < 1##, ##\frac{1}{2} \ln{ \left| \dfrac{v_2^2-1}{v_1^2-1} \right|} = \dfrac{1}{2} \ln{\left( \dfrac{1-v_2^2}{1-v_1^2} \right)} = \ln{\left( \frac{\sqrt{1-v_2^2}}{\sqrt{1-v_1^2}} \right)} = \ln{ \left( \dfrac{\gamma_1}{\gamma_2}\right)} ##. So\begin{align*}

\frac{-1}{u} \left[ \mathrm{artanh}(v_2) - \mathrm{artanh}(v_1) \right] &= \ln \left(\frac{m_2}{m_1} \right) \\

\implies \mathrm{artanh}(v_2) - \mathrm{artanh}(v_1) &= u \ln \left(\frac{m_1}{m_2} \right) \\

w_2 - w_1 &= u \ln \left(\frac{m_1}{m_2} \right)

\end{align*}##w## is the rapidity
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM and vanhees71
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K