How does special relativity apply to the rocket equation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of special relativity to the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, particularly in the context of accelerated frames of reference. Participants explore the implications of special relativity beyond inertial frames, the relationship between proper time and dilated time, and the mathematical underpinnings of hyperbolic motion in relativistic contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether special relativity applies only to inertial frames, with several asserting that it can be applied to flat spacetime, which includes accelerated frames.
  • There is a request for a brief explanation of the hyperbolic motion equation and its relation to proper and dilated time, indicating a lack of familiarity with the mathematical concepts involved.
  • One participant suggests that the misunderstanding about special relativity being limited to inertial frames is common due to the complexity of the mathematics involved, particularly when calculus and hyperbolic functions are required.
  • Another participant explains two methods for deriving the relativistic rocket equation, one involving conservation of momentum and the other focusing on the worldline of an object with constant proper acceleration.
  • Discussion includes references to the four-velocity and four-acceleration, with some participants expressing unfamiliarity with these concepts.
  • There is a specific inquiry about how hyperbolic functions transition into the rocket equations, with participants attempting to clarify this connection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that special relativity is applicable in contexts beyond inertial frames, but there is no consensus on the specifics of how to derive the relativistic rocket equation or the role of hyperbolic functions in this derivation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity of these mathematical transitions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their mathematical background, which may affect their understanding of the concepts discussed. The complexity of the mathematics involved in non-inertial frames and the reliance on hyperbolic functions are noted as potential barriers to comprehension.

  • #31
Here is my try. There are two ways. One is to use coordinate time and the other is to work with the manifestly covariant equations of motion. For the latter way we use the normalized four-velocity and assume that the constant acceleration is in ##x^1##-direction. So we can work in (1+1)-dimensional Minkowski space.

The normalized four-velocity then reads
$$(u^{\mu})=\begin{pmatrix} \cosh y \\ \sinh y \end{pmatrix},$$
where ##y## is the (momentum-space) rapidity, which parametrization works in the constraint ##u_{\mu} u^{\mu}=1##.

The equations of motion are
$$\mathrm{d}_{\tau} u^0=\alpha/c u^1, \quad \mathrm{d}_{\tau} u^1=c \alpha/c u^0.$$
The two equations are not independent because of the constraint. So we use the 2nd equation with the parametrization using the rapidity,
$$\cosh y \mathrm{d}_{\tau} y =\alpha/c \cosh y \; \Rightarrow \; y=\frac{\alpha \tau}{c}+y_0.$$
A direct check shows that indeed also the first eom is fulfilled so we have
$$(u^{\mu})=\begin{pmatrix} \cosh(\alpha \tau/c+y_0) \\ \sinh(\alpha \tau/c+y_0) \end{pmatrix}.$$
The spacetime vector is then defined by
$$\mathrm{d}_{\tau} x^{\mu}=c u^{\mu}$$
from which
$$x^{\mu}=\begin{pmatrix} \frac{c^2}{\alpha} \sinh(\alpha \tau/c+y_0) \\ x_0^{1} + \frac{c^2}{\alpha} [\cosh(\alpha \tau/c + y_0)-1]. \end{pmatrix}$$
I've chosen the initial time such that ##t_0=t(0)=0##.

In terms of coordinate time we have
$$x^1(t)=x_0^1 + \frac{c^2}{\alpha} \left [\sqrt{\alpha^2 t^2/c^2+1}-1 \right]$$
and for the velocity
$$v(t)=\mathrm{d}_t x^1=\frac{\alpha t}{\sqrt{\alpha^2 t^2/c^2+1}}.$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
380
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K