How can we determine if D3xZ2 contains an element of order 6?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spacetimedude
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining whether the group D3xZ2 contains an element of order 6, particularly in comparison to the alternating group A4. Participants explore group properties, subgroup orders, and the implications of group structure on element orders.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that A4 has order 12 and question whether D3xZ2 can have an element of order 6, given that both groups share the same order.
  • It is mentioned that A4 does not have a subgroup of order 6, but the method to show that D3xZ2 has an element of order 6 is still under discussion.
  • One participant explains that in a product group, elements from each factor act independently, suggesting that if an element from D3 has order 3 and an element from Z2 has order 2, then their product can have order 6.
  • Another participant raises a question about the isomorphism between Z12 and Z6xZ2, arguing that despite both having order 24, Z6xZ2 cannot have an element of order 12 due to the structure of its elements.
  • There is a discussion about the coprime rule for cyclic groups, with a participant asking if it applies to groups beyond cyclic ones, and another providing examples of how it holds for cyclic groups with coprime orders.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence of elements of specific orders in the groups discussed. While some assert that D3xZ2 can contain an element of order 6, others focus on the properties of A4 and the implications for subgroup orders. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific element orders in D3xZ2.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of group structure and element orders, but there are unresolved assumptions about the implications of these properties on isomorphisms and subgroup existence.

spacetimedude
Messages
87
Reaction score
1
I have a hard time trying to figure out these types of problems.
Usually, we are supposed to compare their orders, compare if they are both abelian, or see if one group has element of order n which the other group does not have.

So in this case, A4 has order 12 and D3xZ2 also has order 12. So this doesn't help.
An alternating group is non-abelian for n<=3 so A4 is non-abelian. D3 is non-abelian as well and the product of non-abelian to a group is non-abelian (?). So this doesn't help.
So what I'm thinking is, it's either "A4 has an element of order 4, but D3xZ2 does not", or "D3xZ2 has element order 6 but A4 does not".
So my question is, how do we find that D3xZ2 does or does not contain element of order 6? What if it was Z3xZ2 or S4xD3?

Are there any tricks to figuring out if a product of two groups has element of order n so that I can compare it with the other group, in this case A4?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##A_4## doesn't have a subgroup of order 6.
 
fresh_42 said:
##A_4## doesn't have a subgroup of order 6.
Okay, but how do we show that D3xZ2 has an element of order 6?
 
I assumed ##D_3## to denote the dihedral group. Then ##D_3## is a subgroup of ##D_3 \times \mathbb{Z}_2## per definition of the direct product. An isomorphism would map one subgroup to another without changing the number of elements. So ##D_3## (with six elements) cannot be isomorphically mapped into ##A_4##.
 
in a product group, the two factors act independently of each other, so if x is an element of D3 of order 3, and y is an element of Z2 of order 2, then (x,y) has order 6. try multiplying it by itself and see what happens. i.e. (x,y)^n = (x^n,y^n)...so...

one can also see what order are the elements of A4 by representing it as the rotations of a tetrahedron, (which permute the four vertices). Then one sees there are eight elements of order 3 (each fixing some vertex) and three elements of order 2, (each intertchanging two disjoint pairs of vertices).
 
mathwonk said:
in a product group, the two factors act independently of each other, so if x is an element of D3 of order 3, and y is an element of Z2 of order 2, then (x,y) has order 6. try multiplying it by itself and see what happens. i.e. (x,y)^n = (x^n,y^n)...so...

one can also see what order are the elements of A4 by representing it as the rotations of a tetrahedron, (which permute the four vertices). Then one sees there are eight elements of order 3 (each fixing some vertex) and three elements of order 2, (each intertchanging two disjoint pairs of vertices).
I understand that the order of product group is the product of the individual orders.

But what I'm confused about is, say, why is Z12 not isomorphic to Z6xZ2? They both have order 24, but why can we say that Z6xZ2 does not have element of order 12? I thought possible element of order divides the order of the group by Lagrange's theorem, so since |Z6xZ2|=24. doesn't Z6xZ2 have element of order 12?
Thanks
 
spacetimedude said:
I understand that the order of product group is the product of the individual orders.

But what I'm confused about is, say, why is Z12 not isomorphic to Z6xZ2? They both have order 24, but why can we say that Z6xZ2 does not have element of order 12? I thought possible element of order divides the order of the group by Lagrange's theorem, so since |Z6xZ2|=24. doesn't Z6xZ2 have element of order 12?
Thanks

No it doesn't. If we have an element ##(a,b) \in ℤ_6 \times ℤ_2## and addition as group operation then we get
$$(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b) = ((a+a+a+a+a+a),(b+b)+(b+b)+(b+b)) = (0, 0+0+0) = (0,0) $$
that is, six is the highest possible order and hence no isomorphism to ##ℤ_{12}## can exist.

You can have different groups with the same number of elements. The smallest examples are ##ℤ_4## and ##ℤ_2^2 = ℤ_2 \times ℤ_2 ≅ D_2 ≅ V_4##. The last one, the dihedral group ##D_2## is also known as Klein's four-group ##V_4##. All elements are of order 2 there. The formal definition is, e.g. ##V_4 = <a,b | a^2 = b^2 = (ab)^2 = 1>##. You could write down both multiplication (or addition) tables of both groups with four elements as an exercise and look for the differences.

Edit: Here you can find a list of all small groups: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_small_groups

Edit 2: ##ℤ_{12} ≅ ℤ_3 \times ℤ_4## Here you get an element of order 12, because 3 and 4 are coprime. Therefore 12 is the least common multiple to get both components simultaneously and for sure to zero (as neutral element).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: spacetimedude
fresh_42 said:
No it doesn't. If we have an element ##(a,b) \in ℤ_6 \times ℤ_2## and addition as group operation then we get
$$(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b)+(a,b) = ((a+a+a+a+a+a),(b+b)+(b+b)+(b+b)) = (0, 0+0+0) = (0,0) $$
that is, six is the highest possible order and hence no isomorphism to ##ℤ_{12}## can exist.

You can have different groups with the same number of elements. The smallest examples are ##ℤ_4## and ##ℤ_2^2 = ℤ_2 \times ℤ_2 ≅ D_2 ≅ V_4##. The last one, the dihedral group ##D_2## is also known as Klein's four-group ##V_4##. All elements are of order 2 there. The formal definition is, e.g. ##V_4 = <a,b | a^2 = b^2 = (ab)^2 = 1>##. You could write down both multiplication (or addition) tables of both groups with four elements as an exercise and look for the differences.

Edit: Here you can find a list of all small groups: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_small_groups

Edit 2: ##ℤ_{12} ≅ ℤ_3 \times ℤ_4## Here you get an element of order 12, because 3 and 4 are coprime. Therefore 12 is the least common multiple to get both components simultaneously and for sure to zero (as neutral element).
Thank you. Does the coprime rule saying Z12 is isomorphic to Z4xZ3 work with groups other than Z (I can't really think of an example)?
 
spacetimedude said:
Thank you. Does the coprime rule saying Z12 is isomorphic to Z4xZ3 work with groups other than Z (I can't really think of an example)?
For cyclic groups ##ℤ_p## and ##ℤ_q## with coprime ##p,q## holds ##ℤ_p \times ℤ_q ≅ ℤ_{pq}## because they have single generators of appropriate orders.
I'm not sure what you meant by "work with other groups". There are many non-abelian finite groups or semidirect products of finite groups to build all possible variations of finite groups. The basic property of cyclic groups is that there is only one generator. Things are much different if there are more than one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: spacetimedude

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K