MHB How can we prove $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$ for the given condition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that for real numbers A, B, and C, if the inequality |Ax^2 + Bx + C| ≤ 1 holds for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1, then |Cx^2 + Bx + A| ≤ 2 must also be true for the same range of x. The proof utilizes the functions f(x) = Ax^2 + Bx + C and g(x) = Cx^2 + Bx + A, establishing that g(-1) and g(1) are bounded by 1. By analyzing the behavior of g(x) and applying the Mean Value Theorem, it is shown that g(x) cannot exceed 2 or fall below -2, leading to the conclusion that |g(x)| ≤ 2 for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1. The discussion highlights the significance of the constant C in controlling the curvature of g(x), ensuring it does not exceed the established bounds.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
The real numbers $A,\,B,\,C$ satisfy the condition such that for $-1\le x\le 1$, the inequality $|Ax^2+Bx+C|\le 1$ holds.

Prove that $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$ for the same $x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
The real numbers $A,\,B,\,C$ satisfy the condition such that for $-1\le x\le 1$, the inequality $|Ax^2+Bx+C|\le 1$ holds.

Prove that $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$ for the same $x$.
let :$f(x)=Ax^2+Bx+C,\,\,\,g(x)=Cx^2+Bx+A$
then we have :$-1\leq f(0)=C\leq 1----(1)$
$-1\leq f(1)=A+B+C\leq 1---(2)$
$-1\leq f(-1)=A-B+C\leq 1---(3)$
now $-2<-1\leq g(1)=C+B+A=A+B+C\leq 1<2---(4)$
$-2<-1\leq g(-1)=C-B+A=A-B+C\leq 1<2---(5)$
as for the domain of $A$: to satisfy $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$
we get: $-2\leq g(0)=A\le 2$
for one case :$f(x)=2x^2-1,\,\,\, g(x)=-x^2+2$
 
Last edited:
[sp]I'll use Albert's notation $f(x) = Ax^2 + Bx + C$, $g(x) = Cx^2 + Bx + A$. Notice that $g(-1) = f(-1) = A-B+C$ and $g(1) = f(1) = A+B+C$. Therefore $|g(-1)| \leqslant 1$ and $|g(1)| \leqslant 1.$ Also, $C = f(0)$ and so $|C| \leqslant 1$.

Suppose that for some $x$ with $-1< x< 1$, $g(x) >2$. Then $g(x) - g(1) > 2-1 = 1$, so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} > \dfrac1{1-x}.$ Similarly, $g(x) - g(-1) >1$ so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} > \dfrac1{1+x}.$ Therefore $$\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} + \dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} > \dfrac1{1-x} + \dfrac1{1+x} = \dfrac2{1-x^2} >2.$$
On the other hand, $g(x) - g(1) = Cx^2 + Bx + A - (C+B+A) = C(x^2-1) + B(x-1)$, so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} = -C(x+1) - B.$

Similarly, $g(x) - g(-1) = C(x^2-1) + B(x+1)$, so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} = C(x-1) + B.$

Therefore $\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} + \dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} = -2C \leqslant 2$ (because $|C|\leqslant 1).$ That contradicts the previous inequality and shows that $g(x)$ can never be greater than $2$.

A similar argument (with most of the signs changed) shows that $g(x)$ can never be less than $-2$. In conclusion, $|g(x)| \leqslant 2$ whenever $-1\leqslant x\leqslant 1.$

Albert's example $f(x) = 2x^2-1$ shows that $|g(x)|$ can attain the value $2$, so $2$ is the best possible constant in this result.

The basic idea in the above proof is that the constant $C$ controls the curvature of the function $g$. Since $|C|\leqslant 1$, the curve cannot bend too quickly. If $g(x)$ takes a value $\leqslant 1$ when $x=-1$, then increases to a value greater than $2$ (at some point $x$) then it cannot bend round sharply enough to get back down to a value $\leqslant 1$ by the time that $x=1$.[/sp]
 
Albert said:
let :$f(x)=Ax^2+Bx+C,\,\,\,g(x)=Cx^2+Bx+A$
then we have :$-1\leq f(0)=C\leq 1----(1)$
$-1\leq f(1)=A+B+C\leq 1---(2)$
$-1\leq f(-1)=A-B+C\leq 1---(3)$
now $-2<-1\leq g(1)=C+B+A=A+B+C\leq 1<2---(4)$
$-2<-1\leq g(-1)=C-B+A=A-B+C\leq 1<2---(5)$
as for the domain of $A$: to satisfy $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$
we get: $-2\leq g(0)=A\le 2$
for one case :$f(x)=2x^2-1,\,\,\, g(x)=-x^2+2$
another proof for $-2\leq A\leq 2$
$-1\leq A+B+C\leq 1---(1)$
$-1\leq A-B+C\leq 1---(2)$
$-1\leq C\leq 1---(3)$
$(1)+(2)$ we have :
$-1\leq A+C\leq 1---(4)$
fom $(3),(4)$
$A-1\leq A+C\leq 1, \rightarrow A\leq 2$
$-1\leq A+C\leq A+1,\rightarrow -2\leq A$
 
Last edited:
Thank you Albert and Opalg for participating in this challenge problem!

Another solution of other that I wish to share with MHB:

Using also Albert's notation, we have

$|A+B+C|=|f(1)|\le 1$, $|A-B+C|=|f(-1)|\le 1$ and $|C|=|f(0)|<1$

Hence,

$\begin{align*}|g(x)|&=\left|C\cdot(x^2-1)+(A+B+C)\cdot\left(\dfrac{1+x}{2}\right)+(A-B+C)\cdot\left(\dfrac{1-x}{2}\right)\right|\\&\le |x^2-1|+\dfrac{|1+x|}{2}+\dfrac{|1-x|}{2}\\&=1-x^2+\dfrac{1+x}{2}+\dfrac{1-x}{2}\\&=2-x^2\\&\le 2\end{align*}$

for $-1\le x\le 1$, and we're done.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K