MHB How can we prove $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$ for the given condition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that for real numbers A, B, and C, if the inequality |Ax^2 + Bx + C| ≤ 1 holds for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1, then |Cx^2 + Bx + A| ≤ 2 must also be true for the same range of x. The proof utilizes the functions f(x) = Ax^2 + Bx + C and g(x) = Cx^2 + Bx + A, establishing that g(-1) and g(1) are bounded by 1. By analyzing the behavior of g(x) and applying the Mean Value Theorem, it is shown that g(x) cannot exceed 2 or fall below -2, leading to the conclusion that |g(x)| ≤ 2 for -1 ≤ x ≤ 1. The discussion highlights the significance of the constant C in controlling the curvature of g(x), ensuring it does not exceed the established bounds.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
The real numbers $A,\,B,\,C$ satisfy the condition such that for $-1\le x\le 1$, the inequality $|Ax^2+Bx+C|\le 1$ holds.

Prove that $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$ for the same $x$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
The real numbers $A,\,B,\,C$ satisfy the condition such that for $-1\le x\le 1$, the inequality $|Ax^2+Bx+C|\le 1$ holds.

Prove that $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$ for the same $x$.
let :$f(x)=Ax^2+Bx+C,\,\,\,g(x)=Cx^2+Bx+A$
then we have :$-1\leq f(0)=C\leq 1----(1)$
$-1\leq f(1)=A+B+C\leq 1---(2)$
$-1\leq f(-1)=A-B+C\leq 1---(3)$
now $-2<-1\leq g(1)=C+B+A=A+B+C\leq 1<2---(4)$
$-2<-1\leq g(-1)=C-B+A=A-B+C\leq 1<2---(5)$
as for the domain of $A$: to satisfy $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$
we get: $-2\leq g(0)=A\le 2$
for one case :$f(x)=2x^2-1,\,\,\, g(x)=-x^2+2$
 
Last edited:
[sp]I'll use Albert's notation $f(x) = Ax^2 + Bx + C$, $g(x) = Cx^2 + Bx + A$. Notice that $g(-1) = f(-1) = A-B+C$ and $g(1) = f(1) = A+B+C$. Therefore $|g(-1)| \leqslant 1$ and $|g(1)| \leqslant 1.$ Also, $C = f(0)$ and so $|C| \leqslant 1$.

Suppose that for some $x$ with $-1< x< 1$, $g(x) >2$. Then $g(x) - g(1) > 2-1 = 1$, so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} > \dfrac1{1-x}.$ Similarly, $g(x) - g(-1) >1$ so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} > \dfrac1{1+x}.$ Therefore $$\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} + \dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} > \dfrac1{1-x} + \dfrac1{1+x} = \dfrac2{1-x^2} >2.$$
On the other hand, $g(x) - g(1) = Cx^2 + Bx + A - (C+B+A) = C(x^2-1) + B(x-1)$, so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} = -C(x+1) - B.$

Similarly, $g(x) - g(-1) = C(x^2-1) + B(x+1)$, so that $\dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} = C(x-1) + B.$

Therefore $\dfrac{g(x) - g(1)}{1-x} + \dfrac{g(x) - g(-1)}{1+x} = -2C \leqslant 2$ (because $|C|\leqslant 1).$ That contradicts the previous inequality and shows that $g(x)$ can never be greater than $2$.

A similar argument (with most of the signs changed) shows that $g(x)$ can never be less than $-2$. In conclusion, $|g(x)| \leqslant 2$ whenever $-1\leqslant x\leqslant 1.$

Albert's example $f(x) = 2x^2-1$ shows that $|g(x)|$ can attain the value $2$, so $2$ is the best possible constant in this result.

The basic idea in the above proof is that the constant $C$ controls the curvature of the function $g$. Since $|C|\leqslant 1$, the curve cannot bend too quickly. If $g(x)$ takes a value $\leqslant 1$ when $x=-1$, then increases to a value greater than $2$ (at some point $x$) then it cannot bend round sharply enough to get back down to a value $\leqslant 1$ by the time that $x=1$.[/sp]
 
Albert said:
let :$f(x)=Ax^2+Bx+C,\,\,\,g(x)=Cx^2+Bx+A$
then we have :$-1\leq f(0)=C\leq 1----(1)$
$-1\leq f(1)=A+B+C\leq 1---(2)$
$-1\leq f(-1)=A-B+C\leq 1---(3)$
now $-2<-1\leq g(1)=C+B+A=A+B+C\leq 1<2---(4)$
$-2<-1\leq g(-1)=C-B+A=A-B+C\leq 1<2---(5)$
as for the domain of $A$: to satisfy $|Cx^2+Bx+A|\le 2$
we get: $-2\leq g(0)=A\le 2$
for one case :$f(x)=2x^2-1,\,\,\, g(x)=-x^2+2$
another proof for $-2\leq A\leq 2$
$-1\leq A+B+C\leq 1---(1)$
$-1\leq A-B+C\leq 1---(2)$
$-1\leq C\leq 1---(3)$
$(1)+(2)$ we have :
$-1\leq A+C\leq 1---(4)$
fom $(3),(4)$
$A-1\leq A+C\leq 1, \rightarrow A\leq 2$
$-1\leq A+C\leq A+1,\rightarrow -2\leq A$
 
Last edited:
Thank you Albert and Opalg for participating in this challenge problem!

Another solution of other that I wish to share with MHB:

Using also Albert's notation, we have

$|A+B+C|=|f(1)|\le 1$, $|A-B+C|=|f(-1)|\le 1$ and $|C|=|f(0)|<1$

Hence,

$\begin{align*}|g(x)|&=\left|C\cdot(x^2-1)+(A+B+C)\cdot\left(\dfrac{1+x}{2}\right)+(A-B+C)\cdot\left(\dfrac{1-x}{2}\right)\right|\\&\le |x^2-1|+\dfrac{|1+x|}{2}+\dfrac{|1-x|}{2}\\&=1-x^2+\dfrac{1+x}{2}+\dfrac{1-x}{2}\\&=2-x^2\\&\le 2\end{align*}$

for $-1\le x\le 1$, and we're done.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top