I How can we prove the kinetic energy equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the kinetic energy equation through the work-energy principle, stating that the work done equals the change in kinetic energy in a mechanical system. It outlines the mathematical derivation of work done, starting from the force applied to displacement and integrating over velocity. The conversation highlights that when velocity and its differential are aligned, the standard kinetic energy equation of 1/2mv^2 holds true. It also addresses scenarios where velocity components are in different directions, suggesting that the general kinetic energy equation can still be validated by analyzing each component separately. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of considering directional components in kinetic energy calculations.
murshiddreamengineer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
does the kinetic energy equation always work? it has proved for only when acceleration and and velocity are in the same direction.
Proof of kinetic energy
work done equals a change in kinetic energy in a mechanical system.
δW = F.ds
W = ∫F.ds
W = m∫a.ds
W = m∫(dv/dt).ds
W = m∫v.dv

here if v and dv are in the same direction the change in kinetic energy will be the usual equation. what happens if both are in different directions how can we prove that the general equation for kinetic energy will be 1/2mv^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It works individually on each component’s contribution. That is ##\int v_1 dv_1 = v_1^2/2## etc.
 
  • Like
Likes john1954, B0B, sophiecentaur and 1 other person
Thank you. I forgot to think that.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top