MHB How Can We Verify the Telegraph Equation for an Electrical Cable with Leakage?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the Telegraph equation for an electrical cable experiencing leakage. The initial equations relating voltage and current are provided, but a correction is noted in the second-order equation. Participants suggest starting with the given equations for voltage and current to derive the required forms for V and I. The approach involves calculating the second derivatives and substituting terms to align with the target equation. The conversation emphasizes a systematic method to achieve the verification of the Telegraph equation.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I am confused about how to start with the following problem:

Consider an electrical cable running along the x-axis that is not well insulated from the ground, so that leakage occurs along its entire length. Let V(x,t) and I(x,t) denote the voltage and current at point x in the wire at time t. These functions are related to each other by the system

${V}_{x}=-L{I}_{t}-RI$ and ${I}_{x}=-C{V}_{t}-GV$ where L is the inductance, R is the resistance, C is the capacitance, and G is the leakage to ground. Show that V and I each satisfy:

${u}_{xx}=LC{u}_{tt}+(RC+L){u}_{t}+RGu$.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cbarker1,

There appears to be an error in the second order equation; it should be $$u_{xx}= LCu_{tt}+(RC+GL)u_{t}+RGu.$$ From here you want to work with the two given equations for $V_{x}$ and $I_{x}$ to see if you can get them to satisfy $$V_{xx} = LCV_{tt}+(RC+GL)V_{t}+RGV$$ and $$I_{xx} = LCI_{tt}+(RC+GL)I_{t}+RGI,$$ respectively. For example, you could start by using the $V_{x}$ equation to compute $V_{xx}$ obtaining $$V_{xx} = -LI_{tx}-RI_{x} = -LI_{tx}+RCV_{t}+RGV,$$ where the second equality comes from using the equation for $I_{x}$. You can see that this is a promising start because the terms $RCV_{t}$ and $RGV$ are already present, which is good because they should be there according to the formula we are trying to establish. See if you can fill in the rest of the details for $V_{xx}$, then try moving on to $I_{xx}.$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K