MHB How Can You Verify the Sum of Roots in a Quadratic Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Let A and B be roots of the quadratic equation
ax^2 + bx + c = 0. Verify the statement.

A + B = -b/a

What are the steps to verify this statement?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Let A and B be roots of the quadratic equation
ax^2 + bx + c = 0. Verify the statement.

A + B = -b/a

What are the steps to verify this statement?
There is a theorem for this, but let's do it logically. The two solutions, A and B of the quadratic are
[math]A = \frac{-b + \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math] and [math]B = \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math]

Now add the two. (Hint: What happens to the radicals?)

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
There is a theorem for this, but let's do it logically. The two solutions, A and B of the quadratic are
[math]A = \frac{-b + \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math] and [math]B = \frac{-b - \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}[/math]

Now add the two. (Hint: What happens to the radicals?)

-Dan

The radicals disappear. We are then left with (-2b)/(2a).
Of course, (-2b)/(2a) simplifies to -b/a.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top