How come a bouncing ball does not exhibit SHM characteristics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A bouncing ball does not exhibit Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) characteristics due to the absence of a restoring force that would return it to its original position. The contact force experienced during the collision with the ground disrupts the motion, preventing the ball from maintaining a consistent oscillation pattern. While a hypothetical scenario with perfectly elastic collisions could minimize energy loss, the fundamental definition of SHM requires a proportional force acting opposite to displacement, which is not present in the case of a bouncing ball.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) principles
  • Knowledge of force dynamics, particularly restoring forces
  • Familiarity with elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Basic physics concepts related to motion and energy conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical definition of Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM)
  • Explore the concept of restoring forces in oscillatory systems
  • Study the differences between elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Examine real-world examples of SHM in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and forces in physical systems.

.NoStyle
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How come a bouncing ball does not exhibit SHM characteristics?


Homework Equations


no clue



The Attempt at a Solution



When I think of SHM, I don't think of contact forces. In the bouncing call case, there is a contact force present when the ball hits the ground.

Would the graph for a bouncing ball look curved as it approached it's height, but then a sharp V as it hits the ground?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the defining characteristic of a system in SHM? Does this apply to a bouncing ball?
 
Think of it this way...

As the ball bounces, why do the time intervals that the ball is in the air get smaller the longer the ball bounces... it is missing a certain force that is essential to SHM...
 
The fact that the ball is airborne for shorter periods of times after each consecutive bounce is not the reason why it doesn't count as SHM. One can envisage a hypothetical scenario where the collision of the ball with the floor is entirely elastic; no kinetic energy is lost to the floor as heat, sound etc. There is something more fundamental in the definition of SHM than that consideration.
 
Defennder said:
The fact that the ball is airborne for shorter periods of times after each consecutive bounce is not the reason why it doesn't count as SHM. One can envisage a hypothetical scenario where the collision of the ball with the floor is entirely elastic; no kinetic energy is lost to the floor as heat, sound etc. There is something more fundamental in the definition of SHM than that consideration.

maybe were on a different wavelength here, but i was hinting at... its not SHM because it has no restoring force... aka... why the ball doesn't return to its original position. I wasnt saying that's why it isn't SHM, i was using that as an example as to aid him in finding the answer.
 
.NoStyle said:

Homework Statement


How come a bouncing ball does not exhibit SHM characteristics?

Homework Equations


no clue

The Attempt at a Solution



When I think of SHM, I don't think of contact forces. In the bouncing call case, there is a contact force present when the ball hits the ground.

Would the graph for a bouncing ball look curved as it approached it's height, but then a sharp V as it hits the ground?

(By the way, a bouncing ball that is in motion in another direction exhibits what you describe with the sharp V at the impulse of the floor changing direction.

Thanks
From Wikipedia:
"In words, simple harmonic motion is "motion where the force acting on a body and thereby acceleration of the body is proportional to, and opposite in direction to the displacement from its equilibrium position" (i.e. F = − kx)."

Your instinct looks correct. The contact with the floor is an impulse force that perturbs the constant accelerated motion that it is otherwise subjected to in one direction of gravity only.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K