How come black holes have a mass?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, specifically addressing the question of how they possess mass and the implications of gravity in relation to them. Participants explore theoretical aspects, gravitational interactions, and the formation of black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that if the sun were to disappear, the Earth would continue its orbit for a time due to the finite speed of gravity, raising questions about the nature of gravity in relation to black holes.
  • Another participant explains that black holes are formed from matter, thus they inherently possess mass.
  • A participant expresses confusion about how gravity can escape from a black hole, given that nothing else can escape, questioning the nature of gravitational interactions.
  • It is suggested that gravity is an interaction with the gravitational field rather than with the source of gravity, indicating that the field created during the formation of a black hole remains unchanged.
  • One participant references Einstein's theory of General Relativity, stating that gravity is a manifestation of the geometry of spacetime, implying that nothing needs to escape a black hole to affect spacetime.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding gravitational waves produced by merging black holes, emphasizing that these events occur outside the Schwarzschild radius, allowing for detection without communication behind the event horizon.
  • Another participant elaborates on the mechanics of gravitational waves, describing how they are generated by the movement of masses and how the interaction of black holes leads to changes in the gravitational field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying viewpoints on the nature of gravity in relation to black holes, with some agreeing on the role of the gravitational field while others question the implications of gravity escaping a black hole. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference theoretical frameworks and concepts such as the Schwarzschild radius and gravitational waves, but there are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the nature of gravity and its interactions with black holes.

Dhaga
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
If the sun disappear right now, we won't notice before 8 and something minutes due to the speed of light. The Earth will keep going it's way on it's orbit because, as everything, gravity cannot exceed light speed.

The same would apply if we were orbiting à black hole.

I often heard of the graviton, an hypothesis for a particle carrying gravity. Nothing can escape à black hole (only degenerated particles over very long period of time) so why is gravity escaping?

In other words, why do black holes have a mass?
Does this question makes any sense?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and berkeman
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mabe I should have asked my question in another way. I know black holes are made of matter, but I wonder why gravity is escaping out of them.

Gravity travels at the speed of light, not fast enough to escape à black hole...
 
Gravity is effectively an interaction with the gravitational field, not with the source of it. The distant gravitational field is created when the black hole is formed (and does not change at all for example if an object of a given mass collapses in a spherically symmetrical way).
 
Einstein's great accomplishment with GR was showing gravity is the geometry of spacetime. Nothing need escape a black hole to warp spacetime.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
Gravity is effectively an interaction with the gravitational field, not with the source of it. The distant gravitational field is created when the black hole is formed (and does not change at all for example if an object of a given mass collapses in a spherically symmetrical way).
So the merging of the two black holes that caused the LIGO chirp happened outside of the Schwarzschild radius, and that's why we could detect the event?
 
berkeman said:
So the merging of the two black holes that caused the LIGO chirp happened outside of the Schwarzschild radius, and that's why we could detect the event?

The gravitational waves were produced while the black holes were orbiting one another, initially well outside the Schwarzschild radius. Even a black hole has to follow the shape of space-time, so no communication behind the event horizon is necessary for that to happen.

Gravitational waves are driven by the sources of the fields being moved rapidly, causing a ripple of a slight change in direction to move through space-time at the speed of light. By conservation of momentum, it's not possible for one source to move on its own, so on average the field changes caused by a pair of masses orbiting one another cancel out (which means that there is no "dipole" radiation). However, as the system moves from maximum elongation to minimum elongation, there is effectively a slight squashing and relaxing of space perpendicular to the elongation, and that propagates as a "quadrupole" ripple through space.

When the black holes get close enough, they start to interact and combine directly, with the event horizon deforming until it joins and encloses both, creating a single spinning black hole. That happens during the "ring down" phase. I think the idea is that the initial merged shape is like a dumbbell but rapidly becomes more circular, after which there is no longer any gravitational signal. Again, there is still no need for anything to communicate behind the event horizon, in that each part of the system is still simply following the shape of space-time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and 1oldman2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K