How comes the big bang singularity didn't need space and time?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of singularities in the context of the Big Bang and black holes. It establishes that before the Big Bang, there was no space or time, raising questions about how a singularity could exist without these dimensions. The conversation references Stephen Hawking's work, emphasizing that singularities represent points where general relativity fails, indicating a need for a theory of quantum gravity to fully understand these phenomena. The consensus is that while the universe began in a hot, dense state, it does not necessarily imply a singularity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on singularities
  • Familiarity with the concept of black holes and their formation
  • Knowledge of quantum gravity theories and their significance
  • Basic comprehension of cosmological models, including cyclical models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of general relativity on singularities and black holes
  • Study Stephen Hawking's theories on the universe and singularities
  • Explore current theories of quantum gravity and their potential to explain singularities
  • Investigate cyclical models of the universe and their philosophical implications
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the fundamental questions of the universe's origins and the nature of singularities.

Abidal Sala
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Obviously before the big bang there was no space and no time, so how comes the big bang singularity itself existed without space and time? do black holes' singularities not need space and time to exist too? or at least in order for them to come and exist there has to be space and time at first place
 
Space news on Phys.org
Abidal Sala said:
Obviously before the big bang there was no space and no time, so how comes the big bang singularity itself existed without space and time? do black holes' singularities not need space and time to exist too? or at least in order for them to come and exist there has to be space and time at first place

I am not an expert in the field. As far, i have read from this forum nothing is known about the state of the universe at T = 0. However there are models or hypothesis about the state of the universe at the very beginning. Same with the black hole. At best from what i have read here, the universe was in a very dense state.

And singularity does not have explanatory power that gives us an understanding of the beginning of universe or inside a black hole.
 
Last edited:
Abidal Sala said:
Obviously before the big bang there was no space and no time, so how comes the big bang singularity itself existed without space and time? do black holes' singularities not need space and time to exist too? or at least in order for them to come and exist there has to be space and time at first place



Here is a relevant excerpt that might be viewed as self-contradictory.

Stephen Hawking's Universe
Contributed by Stephen Hawking, Richard Talcott, Michio Kaku, Alan Guth, Lee Smolin, Marcelo Gleiser, Seth Shostak, Carlos Frenk, Barry Levine, Mohammad Riza, David Filkin, William Grant, Ellen Mendlow, David McCarthy, Gina Niemiec, Janette Afsharian, et al.


Singularitys

The destiny of all matter that falls into a black hole is to get crushed to a point of zero volume and infinite density—a singularity. General relativity also implies that our expanding universe began from a singularity.

A singularity is a region of space-time in which gravitational forces are so strong that even general relativity, the well-proven gravitational theory of Einstein, and the best theory we have for describing the structure of the universe, breaks down there. A singularity marks a point where the curvature of space-time is infinite, or, in other words, it possesses zero volume and infinite density. General relativity demands that singularities arise under two circumstances. 


First, a singularity must form during the creation of a black hole. When a very massive star reaches the end of its life, its core, which was previously held up by the pressure of the nuclear fusion that was taking place, collapses and all the matter in the core gets crushed out of existence at the singularity. Second, general relativity shows that under certain reasonable assumptions, an expanding universe like ours must have begun as a singularity.
http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/archive/hawking_universe.html
 
Singularity means "we have no clue" in science speak. We need a theory of quantum gravity to rid ourselves of those enigmatic singularities. But, even that is unlikely to be enough to explain the origin of the universe. Even cyclical models merely defer the question backwards in time. Perhaps the universe has always existed in some form or another, even though that is not much of an answer. Sort of like saying you came from your parents [but, where did your parents come from?] Just about every imaginable explanation is probably unprovable. It's natures version of Godel's incompleteness theorem.
 
Abidal Sala said:
Obviously before the big bang there was no space and no time, so how comes the big bang singularity itself existed without space and time? do black holes' singularities not need space and time to exist too? or at least in order for them to come and exist there has to be space and time at first place

The Universe was initially in a hot dense state. That's where the theories and evidence are very clear.

This doesn't mean it was a singularity.
If the Universe is infinite, that hot dense state was also infinite.
If the Universe is finite, in the initial state it must have been small. However even in this case the current theories don't go all the way to a singularity.
 
Chronos said:
Even cyclical models merely defer the question backwards in time. Perhaps the universe has always existed in some form or another, even though that is not much of an answer.

But a good answer. It would be nice to know how the universe works and what its future holds. Where it came from seems less important.
 
Chronos said:
Singularity means "we have no clue" in science speak. We need a theory of quantum gravity to rid ourselves of those enigmatic singularities. But, even that is unlikely to be enough to explain the origin of the universe. Even cyclical models merely defer the question backwards in time. Perhaps the universe has always existed in some form or another, even though that is not much of an answer. Sort of like saying you came from your parents [but, where did your parents come from?] Just about every imaginable explanation is probably unprovable. It's natures version of Godel's incompleteness theorem.

"Origin" is a useful word for mortals. Probably not such a useful concept when trying to figure out the universe. There are many blocks to understanding this - language is just one of them (but a big one, i think). i realize this explanation is not scientific, but i think it's something worth considering.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K