How Did North Long Beach Transform Over the Decades?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evolution
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the transformation of North Long Beach, California, over several decades, focusing on personal experiences and observations regarding changes in the neighborhood's demographics, safety, and overall environment. Participants share reflections on their childhood experiences, the impact of socio-economic factors, and the revitalization of the area.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recounts their childhood in North Long Beach as a safe, clean, and predominantly white suburb, which deteriorated due to socio-economic changes and forced busing, leading to increased violence and gang activity.
  • Another participant expresses empathy for the original poster's (OP) experiences and reflects on the current state of neighborhoods in other cities like Oakland and Detroit.
  • Some participants challenge the OP's implication that demographic changes led to the neighborhood's decline, suggesting instead that socio-economic factors are more significant than ethnicity.
  • There are references to personal anecdotes, including a mention of Snoop Dog's childhood activities in the area, which adds a cultural context to the discussion.
  • One participant questions the appropriateness of the topic for the forum, suggesting it may be better suited for a personal blog rather than a physics forum.
  • Another participant reflects on their own diverse neighborhood experiences, indicating that they have not faced issues with different ethnic groups.
  • The OP notes that the neighborhood has undergone revitalization, with improvements in the appearance of homes and yards, contrasting with their earlier memories of decline.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the causes of the neighborhood's changes. While some empathize with the OP's narrative, others challenge the implications about ethnicity and neighborhood decline, indicating that socio-economic factors may play a more critical role. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of the discussion, noting that the OP's observations may not fully account for the complexities of socio-economic dynamics and neighborhood transformations. There are also references to specific historical events, such as the Watts Riots, which are mentioned as part of the context but not fully explored in the discussion.

  • #31
Ivan Seeking said:
What are they calling a "street dealer"?
The actual point of sale people. The people selling whatever in single packets/doses.

Ivan Seeking said:
The guy selling it isn't the one making the money ...
That's what I said. Let's say a kid buys 30 packets of whatever at, say, $6 a packet. Then he sells them for $10 a packet. So he nets $120 per every 30 packets he sells of whatever he's selling. If the selling areas are as jammed with sellers as I'm guessing they are, then the kid will be lucky to unload, say, 10 to 15 packets per day.

Ivan Seeking said:
You can't limit an entire enterprise to the lowly street dealer. It is much bigger than that.
I agree. I said that most of the people involved (ie., the street dealers) don't make much money -- about minimum wage on average (I'll try to find that study. It was interesting. I would have thought that the street dealers make a lot more, but apparently they don't.). Of course, the more hours they work, the more money they'll make.

The people who make the big money are a distinct minority in the scheme of things. As you noted ... the growers, distributors, wholesalers.

Ivan Seeking said:
Do you really think the Mexican mafia is working for $300 a week? Ten year old kids in LA are probably making that much.
I would guess that most of the people in the Mexican mafia don't make much money. With a distinct few at the very top being quite rich.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
I got a kick out of this exchange between Barney Frank, and George Will, on This Week, today.

FRANK: Can I get an answer on marijuana, George? Are you with me on it? I mean, personal liberty, if someone wants to smoke marijuana who's an adult, why do you want to make them go to jail?

WILL: As you know, first of all, on the Internet gambling, as you know, I'm on the -- a supporter of the Barney Frank bill.

FRANK: Yes.

WILL: With regard to marijuana, I need to know more about -- whether it's a gateway to other drugs. I need to know how you're going to regulate it, whether you're going to advertise it. I am open to the--

FRANK: Oh, you're just a copout.

WILL: We're not--

FRANK: It's been around for a long time. The gateway -- anything is a gateway to anything. That's -- and let's put it this way, that's the slippery slope argument, which is a very anti- libertarian argument. The fact is that if someone is doing something that's not in itself wrong, that it might lead later on to something else, then stop the something else. Don't lock them up for smoking marijuana.

WILL: What you're calling a copout is I'm calling a quest for information.

FRANK: How long is it going to last, George? We've been doing it for decades.

WILL: I understand liberalism's aversion to information because it often does not go in their direction.

FRANK: No, I'm averse -- I've been studying this for a long time. You know, you're on Medicare, and how much longer are we going to have to wait for you to make up your mind?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/transcript-great-american-debates/story?id=15182473&page=14
 
  • #33
Ivan Seeking said:
I got a kick out of this exchange between Barney Frank, and George Will, on This Week, today.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/transcript-great-american-debates/story?id=15182473&page=14
Yes, I watched that. It was somewhat entertaining. I didn't know that Frank was for legalization of marijuana. Good for him -- I agree with that position. He and Reich made the most sensible general statements in the discussion, imo. George Will needs to set about doing the research he says he needs to do on the marijuana thing. As Frank commented, Will's had plenty of time and should make up his mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K