How Did North Long Beach Transform Over the Decades?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Evolution
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The transformation of North Long Beach, California, over the decades reflects significant socio-economic changes. Initially a safe, middle-class suburb, the area deteriorated in the late 1960s and early 1970s due to the influx of gangs and drugs, exacerbated by forced school busing. However, recent observations indicate a revitalization, with improved housing and neighborhood aesthetics, although the demographic composition has shifted. The discussion highlights the complex interplay between race, socio-economic status, and community dynamics in urban environments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of urban socio-economic dynamics
  • Familiarity with the history of school busing in the United States
  • Knowledge of gang culture and its impact on communities
  • Awareness of urban revitalization processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical context of school busing and its effects on urban neighborhoods
  • Explore case studies of urban revitalization in cities like Long Beach and Detroit
  • Investigate the socio-economic factors contributing to gang proliferation in urban areas
  • Examine policies related to drug laws and their impact on community safety and development
USEFUL FOR

Urban planners, sociologists, community activists, and anyone interested in the historical and socio-economic factors influencing urban neighborhoods.

  • #31
Ivan Seeking said:
What are they calling a "street dealer"?
The actual point of sale people. The people selling whatever in single packets/doses.

Ivan Seeking said:
The guy selling it isn't the one making the money ...
That's what I said. Let's say a kid buys 30 packets of whatever at, say, $6 a packet. Then he sells them for $10 a packet. So he nets $120 per every 30 packets he sells of whatever he's selling. If the selling areas are as jammed with sellers as I'm guessing they are, then the kid will be lucky to unload, say, 10 to 15 packets per day.

Ivan Seeking said:
You can't limit an entire enterprise to the lowly street dealer. It is much bigger than that.
I agree. I said that most of the people involved (ie., the street dealers) don't make much money -- about minimum wage on average (I'll try to find that study. It was interesting. I would have thought that the street dealers make a lot more, but apparently they don't.). Of course, the more hours they work, the more money they'll make.

The people who make the big money are a distinct minority in the scheme of things. As you noted ... the growers, distributors, wholesalers.

Ivan Seeking said:
Do you really think the Mexican mafia is working for $300 a week? Ten year old kids in LA are probably making that much.
I would guess that most of the people in the Mexican mafia don't make much money. With a distinct few at the very top being quite rich.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
I got a kick out of this exchange between Barney Frank, and George Will, on This Week, today.

FRANK: Can I get an answer on marijuana, George? Are you with me on it? I mean, personal liberty, if someone wants to smoke marijuana who's an adult, why do you want to make them go to jail?

WILL: As you know, first of all, on the Internet gambling, as you know, I'm on the -- a supporter of the Barney Frank bill.

FRANK: Yes.

WILL: With regard to marijuana, I need to know more about -- whether it's a gateway to other drugs. I need to know how you're going to regulate it, whether you're going to advertise it. I am open to the--

FRANK: Oh, you're just a copout.

WILL: We're not--

FRANK: It's been around for a long time. The gateway -- anything is a gateway to anything. That's -- and let's put it this way, that's the slippery slope argument, which is a very anti- libertarian argument. The fact is that if someone is doing something that's not in itself wrong, that it might lead later on to something else, then stop the something else. Don't lock them up for smoking marijuana.

WILL: What you're calling a copout is I'm calling a quest for information.

FRANK: How long is it going to last, George? We've been doing it for decades.

WILL: I understand liberalism's aversion to information because it often does not go in their direction.

FRANK: No, I'm averse -- I've been studying this for a long time. You know, you're on Medicare, and how much longer are we going to have to wait for you to make up your mind?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/transcript-great-american-debates/story?id=15182473&page=14
 
  • #33
Ivan Seeking said:
I got a kick out of this exchange between Barney Frank, and George Will, on This Week, today.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/transcript-great-american-debates/story?id=15182473&page=14
Yes, I watched that. It was somewhat entertaining. I didn't know that Frank was for legalization of marijuana. Good for him -- I agree with that position. He and Reich made the most sensible general statements in the discussion, imo. George Will needs to set about doing the research he says he needs to do on the marijuana thing. As Frank commented, Will's had plenty of time and should make up his mind.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K