How Did the (2π)^2 Term Arise in the Casimir Force Derivation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the Casimir Force for a system of two parallel plates separated by a distance 'a'. The original poster questions the origin of the (2π)² term in the integral related to the energy density, suggesting a connection to Fourier transforms but expressing uncertainty in proving this connection.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the density of states (DOS) in k space, discussing the implications of periodic boundary conditions and the expansion of functions in multidimensional Fourier series.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the density of states and its relationship to the (2π)² term, while others acknowledge the relevance of these concepts to the original question. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical framework without a definitive consensus on the original poster's query.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a specific source for the solution but does not provide a link, indicating a potential constraint in accessing full information. The discussion also reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty regarding the derivation process and the mathematical terms involved.

kenkhoo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive the Casimir Force on each plate, for a two parallel plate system (L x L), separated at a distance of 'a' apart.

The solution was found in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Derivation_of_Casimir_effect_assuming_zeta-regularization. (sorry I couldn't include link yet). Now my question is how did the (2∏)^2 came out in the integral for <E>,

ffb0365edd056bc1efcbf0a26f82c31f.png


I would think it as the constant from Fourier transform but I was unable to prove that. Any idea how did that thing pop up of nowhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oh this question is moot. It's basically multiplication of the DOS.

Thanks anyway
 
Assume a large hypercubic box in d dimensions of length L. Impose periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) on any function:
[tex] \psi(x_1 + L, x_2, \ldots, x_d) = \psi(x_1, x_2 + L, \ldots, x_d) = \ldots = \psi(x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_d + L)[/tex]
Then, we can expand the function in multidimensional Fourier series:
[tex] \psi(\mathbf{x}) = \sum_{\mathbf{k}}{c_{\mathbf{k}} \, e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x}}}[/tex]
where
[tex] \mathbf{k} = \frac{2\pi}{L} \langle n_1, n_2, \ldots, n_d \rangle[/tex]
is a multidimensional wave vector that can take on discrete values.

In an interval [itex](k_i, k_i + dk_i)[/itex] of the ith component, there are
[tex] dn_i = \frac{L}{2\pi} \, dk_i[/tex]
To find the total number of states within an infinitesimal volume of k space
[tex] dn = \mathrm{\Pi}_{i = 1}^{d}{dn_{i}} = \frac{L^{d}}{(2\pi)^{d}) \, d^{d}k[/tex]
So, the famous factor [itex]L^{d}/(2\pi)^{d}[/itex] gives the density of states in k space.
 
Ah. Yeah I've forgot about the DOS.
Thanks for the detailed explanation!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K