How did they do this simplification?

  • Thread starter Thread starter benj1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying expressions involving exponents and algebraic manipulation, specifically focusing on a worked example that includes terms with variables raised to various powers. Participants are trying to understand the steps taken in the simplification process and the properties of exponents that apply.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the simplification of a fraction involving variables with exponents, questioning how to combine and manipulate these terms. Some suggest breaking down the expression into parts to clarify the operations involved, while others express confusion about specific steps and the use of LaTeX for formatting.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exchange of ideas with some participants providing guidance on exponent rules and algebraic manipulation. However, there is no explicit consensus on the simplification process, as some participants express confusion and seek further clarification on specific points.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention difficulties with LaTeX formatting and express frustration with their understanding of the mathematical concepts involved. There is a recognition of varying levels of comfort with the material among participants.

benj1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

having a bit of trouble going through a worked example, specifically in a section where they simplify the following

1.5L^-.7K^0.7 / 0.7L^0.3K^-0.3 = 1

therefore

1.5k^0.7-(-0.3) / 0.7L^0.3-(-0.7) = 1

part in bold is one I am having trouble with.

Any help appreciated

tried using LATEX but didn't work out at all :\
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean to simplify:
[tex]\frac{1.5 L ^ {-0.7} K ^ {0.6}}{0.7 L ^ {0.3} K ^ {-0.3}}[/tex]?
So, do you know that:
[tex]\frac{\alpha ^ \beta}{\alpha ^ \gamma} = \alpha ^ {\beta - \gamma}[/tex]?
And:
[tex]\alpha ^ {- \beta} = \alpha ^ {0 - \beta} = \frac{a ^ 0}{a ^ \beta} = \frac{1}{\alpha ^ \beta}[/tex]
So applying that to the expression gives:
[tex]\frac{1.5}{0.7} \frac{L ^ {-0.7}}{L ^ {0.3}} \frac{K ^ {0.6}}{K ^ {-0.3}} = \frac{1.5}{0.7} L ^ {-0.7 - 0.3} K ^ {0.6 - (-0.3)} = \frac{1.5}{0.7} \frac{K ^ {0.9}}{L ^ {1.0}}[/tex].
Do you get it now?
 
Last edited:
Looks like they simply grouped similar powers in the numerator and denominator. When you move an exponent to the denominator you subtract that exponents power from the power of the same base that already exists in the denominator. It will be easier to see if you break up the division into something like [tex]\frac{1.5L^{-0.7}}{0.7L^{0.3}}\times\frac{K^{0.7}}{K^{-0.3}}[/tex].
 
thanks heaps for the responses viet and vsage.. much appreciated

viet: the top part you have k^0.6 - it should be k^0.7

and then the indices should cancel each other out

leaving you with

1.5K / 0.7L

Im completely lost with that tex stuff
 
Last edited:
This page contains 3 pdf pages that can help you understand and use LaTeX, it's in the General Physics board.
Just remember that you do not need '\' for numbers, or words, it's just used for functions.
Click on every LaTex image to see its code. For example, click on this one:
[tex]\frac{1.5 K}{0.7 L}[/tex]
 
thanks again..
heres another problem

240=12L^0.5(L/2)^0.5

240=12/sqrt of 2 * L

any help.. again would be appreciated
 
Last edited:
benj1 said:
thanks again..
heres another problem
[tex] 240=12L^0.5\frac{\L}/{2}^0.5<br /> 240 =\frac{12}{\sqrt{2} * L[/tex]
any help.. again would be appreciated

[tex]12L^{0.5} * \frac{L^{0.5}}{2^{0.5}}[/tex] is an equivalent expression to your first one since

this is just properties of exponents.
therefore you can reduce your first expression to
[tex]12 * \sqrt{L} * \sqrt{L} * \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{12}{\sqrt{2}} * L[/tex]

hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
thank you hypermonkey!

i think my lack of sleep is getting the better of me or just my complete inability at maths.

still not really understanding the 12/sqrt of 2 part

sqrt to rid the equation of indices?

why has the 12 gone to the numerator of the fraction?

this is very basic and I am finding it too difficult... *sigh*
 
Last edited:
benj1 said:
thank you hypermonkey!
i think my lack of sleep is getting the better of me or just my complete inability at maths.
still not really understanding the 12/sqrt of 2 part
sqrt to rid the equation of indices?
why has the 12 gone to the numerator of the fraction?
this is very basic and I am finding it too difficult... *sigh*

dont worry about it, we all start somewhere. just as long as you don't get discouraged, youll be mathematizing in no time.
heres what you might now realize
[tex]12 * \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{12}{1} *\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{12}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex]
that is the law of fraction multiplication.
it makes sense too, since
[tex]2 * \frac{1}{2}=2 * 0.5=1=\frac{2}{2}[/tex]
do you agree?
 
  • #10
help here has been overwhelming thanks.. I think I am getting it, wheter its sinking in or not.. :(

the next step is proving a bit of a problem as well :rolleyes:

240 = (12 / sqrt of 2) * L
L = sqrt of 2 * 240 / 12

again any help.. appreciated
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K