How did they get that the vorticity = 2##\omega##?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the relationship between vorticity and angular velocity in meteorology, particularly as presented in the book "Atmospheric Science" by Wallace and Hobbs. The user is struggling to grasp the mathematical definition of vorticity, specifically the equation ∇ × u = 2ω, given their familiarity with related concepts like angular velocity and differentiation. They seek clarification on how the natural coordinate system defined in the book relates to the calculation of vorticity. The user expresses confusion about the application of these concepts in the context of fluid dynamics and meteorology. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of applying theoretical definitions to practical scenarios in atmospheric science.
Hall
Messages
351
Reaction score
87
Homework Statement
Deriving an expression for vorticity.
Relevant Equations
Vorticity =##2 \omega##
I'm learning Meteorology, and using the book Atmospheric Science by Wallace and Hobbs. We're discussing the kinematics of the winds (fluids). I shall post some images to say what I don't understand. This is how they define their natural coordinate system
At any point on the surface one can define a pair of axes of a sys- tem of natural coordinates (s, n), where s is arc length directed downstream along the local streamline, and n is distance directed normal to the streamline and toward the left,
Screenshot 2022-05-25 at 5.48.06 PM.png

Screenshot 2022-05-25 at 5.51.01 PM.png
Screenshot 2022-05-25 at 5.51.31 PM.png
I know and understand the concepts of angular velocity, shear, curvature, differentiation, and partial differentiation but for some reason, which is latent to me, I cannot understand anything that the book has done. Will you please explain it to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure whether I understand the book but mathematical definition of vorticity says
\nabla \times \mathbf{u}=2\mathbf {\omega}
where
u_x=- \omega y,\ u_y=\omega x,\,\ u_z=0
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top