MHB How Do Absolute Values Express At Least and At Most Conditions?

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The distance between x and 4 is at least 8.

Work:

| x - 4 | > or = 8

Correct?

Why must we write greater than or equal to for AT LEAST statements?

2. The distance between x^3 and -1 is at most 0.001.

Work:

| x^3 - (-1) | < or = 0.001

Correct?

Why must we write less than or equal to for AT MOST statements?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
Rewrite each statement using absolute values.

1. The distance between x and 4 is at least 8.

Work:

| x - 4 | > or = 8

Correct?

Why must we write greater than or equal to for AT LEAST statements?

Yes, that's correct. When we say something is "at least" some value, that's equivalent to saying it is that value or greater. If I say I have at least \$20 in my pocket, then you know the money in my pocket is \$20 or more.

RTCNTC said:
2. The distance between x^3 and -1 is at most 0.001.

Work:

| x^3 - (-1) | < or = 0.001

Correct?

Why must we write less than or equal to for AT MOST statements?

That's correct too. When we say some value is at most some other value, then that's equivalent to saying it is that value or less. If I say I have "at most" \$20 in my pocket then you know the money I have in my pocket is less than or equal to \$20. :D
 
Good to know the difference between "at least" and "at most" because it is very common in the world of inequality applications.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top