How Do Different Types of Measurement Uncertainties Compare?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mikelee8a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainties
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the comparison between measurement uncertainties, specifically distinguishing between the uncertainty from significant figures in digital measurements and standard error in statistical measurements. When a digital device displays a reading, such as 24.6, the uncertainty is confined to a range of 24.55 to 24.65, represented as 24.60(5). In contrast, standard error reflects a statistical variation, indicating a 68% probability that the true value lies within a specified range. The conversation also touches on the central limit theorem, emphasizing that repeated measurements can yield a normal distribution of errors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in measurements
  • Familiarity with standard error and its statistical implications
  • Knowledge of the central limit theorem
  • Basic principles of measurement uncertainty
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of significant figures in scientific measurements
  • Explore the concept of standard error in depth, including its calculation and applications
  • Study the central limit theorem and its relevance to measurement errors
  • Investigate different types of measurement uncertainties and their practical applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, statisticians, and professionals in scientific fields who require a clear understanding of measurement uncertainties and their implications in data analysis.

mikelee8a
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

This problem has been bugging me for while. I hope someone can explain it.

1) If I measure something with a digital device and I know that the reading is correct, my only uncertainty is the limited significant figures displayed by the device. So if it read 24.6 the actual value couldn't possibly be less the 24.55 or more than 24.65 (assuming device correctly calibrated and rounds is a suitable fashion). So reading written as 24.60(5). The point is that this error bounds the result, with every value in the range being equally likely.

2) Compare with standard error, used when measuring a value which has a statistical variation over time. As far as I can see this is written in exactly the same way as above but is interpreted as meaning there is a 68% chance of the result lying in the range (compared with 100%) with the quoted value being the most probably value.

My questions are, is there a way knowing which type of error is being used? And what is the relationship between these two measures of uncertainty? I know that if many type 1) measurements are made and combined, a normal prob. distribution emerges (central limit theorem I think)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot estimate the error of what you cannot measure. If you were to repeatedly measure a quantity and get exactly the same value each time to the same limit of precision, the measured standard error would be zero
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K