How Do Dissipative and Conservative Systems Differ in Dynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter broegger
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Dissipative and conservative systems differ primarily in how they handle phase space volumes and energy. In dissipative systems, phase space volumes shrink as energy is lost over time, leading to a decrease in momentum and velocity until kinetic energy is zero. Conversely, conservative systems maintain constant phase space volumes, preserving momentum and velocity relationships, as seen in simple harmonic motion like a pendulum. This distinction is crucial for understanding dynamics in deterministic chaos. Overall, the behavior of these systems significantly impacts their long-term evolution and stability.
broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I'm reading a book on deterministic chaos, and an important distinction seems to be the one between dissipative and conservative dynamical systems. A dissipative system is defined as a system whose "phase space volumes shrink", whereas in a conservative system phase space volumes are conserved.

What does this mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice discussion of Phase Space
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_space

In mathematics and physics, phase space is the space in which all possible states of a system are represented, with each possible state of the system corresponding to one unique point in the phase space. For mechanical systems, the phase space usually consists of all possible values of position and momentum variables. A plot of position and momentum variables as a function of time is sometimes called a phase diagram.

In a conservative system, momentum (velocity) is conserved, i.e. not dissipated (reduced), and a particular set (domain) of position and momentum (velocity) statepoints remains. In SHM, e.g. pendulum, the velocity and position have a preserved relationship.

In a dissipative system, the momentum (velocity) is continually decreasing as a function of position/displacement, as energy is lost (dissipated) with continued motion, until the magnitude of velocity (speed) reaches zero as kinetic energy reaches zero.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K