How Do Eddy Current Losses in Transformer Cores Work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Eddy current losses in transformer cores are defined by the relationship PE = KE*f²*BM², where KE is a constant equal to 2*π²*A²/Rs. The discussion clarifies that the term α in the equation eddy current losses = α(f²*BM²) is proportional to KE, indicating that both expressions represent the same phenomenon of power loss due to eddy currents. The induced EMF in the core is calculated using the formula d∅/dt = ω∅mcos(ωt), leading to the maximum induced EMF (Em) being ω∅m. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately calculating eddy current losses in transformer design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sinusoidal magnetic flux and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic induction principles and formulas
  • Knowledge of transformer core materials and their properties
  • Basic grasp of power loss calculations in electrical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Steinmetz equation for eddy current loss calculations
  • Study the impact of frequency on eddy current losses in transformer cores
  • Explore methods to minimize eddy current losses in transformer design
  • Learn about the effects of core material selection on eddy current losses
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, transformer designers, and students studying electromagnetic theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on optimizing transformer efficiency and understanding power loss mechanisms.

Physicist3
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have been trying to understand eddy current loss in transformer cores but seem to have run into a bit of a misunderstanding with one of the books I have read, and I was wondering if someone could just clarify if I have got this all right.

starting with the beginning, if the magnetic flux varies sinusoidal, then the flux at one instant would be;

∅ = ∅msin(ωt) (I have been told this should be done in degrees and not radians?)

value of induced emf in core at any time (t) =

\frac{d∅}{dt} = ω∅mcos(ωt)

Am I correct in saying that from this second equation, ωθm = Em (Max induced EMF in core)?

If Es = rms value of emf induced in core, this = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}ω∅m = \sqrt{2}∏f∅m = \sqrt{2}∏f(ABm)

Eddy current Power Losses = \frac{E<sub>s</sub><sup>2</sup>}{R<sub>s</sub>}
= \frac{2*∏<sup>2</sup>*f<sup>2</sup>*A<sup>2</sup>*B<sub>m</sub><sup>2</sup>}{R<sub>s</sub>}

The next bit is the section of the notes that seems to confuse me,

Eddy current Power Loss = PE = KE*f2*BM2, where KE = Constant = 2*∏2*A2/Rs.

The book then says 'hence eddy current losses = α (f2*BM2)

Does this mean that KE is the same as α and eddy current power loss is the same as eddy current loss, or are these two different things? As far as I can see they appear the same but I just wanted to make sure from someone who has a bit more experience or knowledge of this.

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Physicist3 said:
value of induced emf in core at any time (t) =

\frac{d∅}{dt} = ω∅mcos(ωt)

Am I correct in saying that from this second equation, ωθm = Em (Max induced EMF in core)?
That would be emf induced per turn in the winding around the core, I think.

The book then says 'hence eddy current losses = α (f2*BM2)

Lose the equals sign. I think that should be a simple proportionality:

eddy current losses α[/size] (f2*BM2)
 
Eddy current Power Loss = PE = KE*f2*BM2, where KE = Constant = 2*∏2*A2/Rs.

The book then says 'hence eddy current losses = α (f2*BM2)

Both are the same, eddy current losses means the power loss due to eddy current.
 
Try a search on Steinmetz - he figured it out by experiment late 1800's
some old textbooks are showing up online nowadays with first-hand explanation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
9K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K