How Do Frequency and Cumulative Distributions Relate to Particle Size Analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The relationship between Frequency Distribution, Cumulative Distribution, and Particle Size Analysis is critical for understanding particle size classification. By conducting a sieve analysis, particles are sorted into size ranges, and their weights are recorded to create a frequency distribution. This distribution is visualized through bar graphs, allowing for quick comparisons of different grinding or transport mechanisms. A cumulative frequency distribution is generated by calculating a running total, providing insights into the mass proportion of particles above or below specific sizes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sieve analysis techniques
  • Familiarity with statistical concepts of frequency and cumulative distributions
  • Ability to interpret bar graphs and data visualizations
  • Knowledge of particle size measurement methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced techniques in sieve analysis for particle size classification
  • Learn about statistical software tools for plotting frequency distributions
  • Explore methods for calculating cumulative frequency distributions in data sets
  • Investigate the impact of different grinding mechanisms on particle size distributions
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, materials scientists, and quality control analysts involved in particle size analysis and classification will benefit from this discussion.

squalenepo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What is the relationship between the Frequency Distribution, Cumulative Distribution and Particle Size?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Frequency distribution and cumulative distribution are statistical concepts.
You have a sample of particles that range from a minimum to a maximum size.

You perform a sieve analysis so as to sort or classify them into size ranges.
See; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_analysis

You then weigh the particles in each class, (size range), and record that data.
By converting the weight falling in each size class to a percentage of the total you eliminate sample size variation.

If you tabulate or plot that data as a bar graph against size class you will have a frequency distribution. Different grinding or transport mechanisms have characteristically different frequency distributions. The comparison of graphed frequency distributions is quick and easy.

If you then compute a running total over the frequency distribution data, you will generate a cumulative frequency distribution, it starts at zero and finally reaches 100%. From that you can quickly identify what proportion of the mass of particles is above or below a particular size.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K