How do I convert the number of efolds to conformal time during inflation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xepto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on converting the number of e-folds (N) to conformal time (τ) during inflation, specifically within a De Sitter expansion framework. The relationship between N and τ is established through the scale factor (a) and the Hubble parameter (H), leading to the equation τ = -1/(a(N_end)e^(-N)H). The correct interpretation of N is that it is defined as the number of e-folds before the end of inflation, with N decreasing as inflation progresses. The scale factor at the end of inflation is given by a_end = e^N a_i, emphasizing the importance of the ratio of scale factors over absolute values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of De Sitter expansion in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the concept of e-folds in inflationary theory
  • Knowledge of the Hubble parameter (H) and its role in cosmological models
  • Basic calculus for performing numerical integrations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the scale factor in inflationary cosmology
  • Learn about the implications of the Hubble parameter in different cosmological models
  • Explore numerical integration techniques for cosmological equations
  • Investigate the relationship between conformal time and physical time in cosmology
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and graduate students studying inflationary models and the dynamics of the early universe.

Xepto
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I need to convert the number of efolds to confromal time during inflation in order to do numerical integrations. Suppose expansion is De Sitter and you have to calculate the integral $$\int^0_{-\infty} d\tau F(N)$$ where F is a function of the efolds number N (from the beginning of inflation). All issues arise at the integration limits. I know that $$a = - \frac{1}{H \tau} $$ but I cannot obtain the correct relationship between N and τ.
(My guess is $$\tau = - \frac{1}{H e^N} $$ but this doesn't seem to be correct. In fact for ##N\rightarrow \infty## we get ##\tau \rightarrow 0##, but for ##N\rightarrow 0## we get ##\tau\rightarrow - \frac{1}{H}##)
Can anyone help me?
Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
What is the relationship between a and N? Hint: N is not defined with respect to the start of inflation, but the end.
 
bapowell said:
What is the relationship between a and N? Hint: N is not defined with respect to the start of inflation, but the end.
From ##dN = H dt##, we get $$N = \text{ln} \frac{a(t_{end})}{a(t)}$$. Tthen ##a(t) = a(t_{end}) e^{-N}##, that can be rewritten in terms of the number of efolds as ##a(N(t)) = a(N_{end}) e^{-N}.## If expansion is DeSitter, ##H## is a constant and $$ \tau = -\frac{1}{a(\tau) H} = - \frac{1}{a(N_{end}) e^{-N} H},$$ that can be inverted $$ N=\text{ln} \Biggl( - \frac{1}{\tau H a(N=0) } \Biggl). $$ If this is correct, how can I calculate the scale factor ##a## at the end of inflation?
 
If the universe grows by N e-folds of expansion during inflation, then a_{end} = e^N a_i. What's important is not the value of the scale factor at a particular time, because it can always be renormalized (e.g. the scale factor is often defined to be equal to 1 today). What's generally important in cosmology is the ratio of scale factors at two different times because this gives the amount of expansion.

Also, N is defined as the number of e-folds before the end of inflation. This means that dN = -Hdt -- the number N gets smaller as inflation progresses, and becomes N=0 at the end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K