How do I differentiate e^-2x * y?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around differentiating the expression e^{-2x}y with respect to x, focusing on the application of the product rule in differentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the differentiation process, particularly the use of the product rule and the implications of the notation dy/dx. There are questions about the meaning of the notation and its application in this context.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the differentiation process and expressing varying opinions on the notation used in calculus. Some guidance on the product rule has been shared, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is some frustration expressed regarding the notation introduced by Leibniz, indicating a potential barrier to understanding for some participants. The discussion includes personal preferences for different notational systems.

James889
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I need to differentiate the following [tex]\frac{d}{dx}[e^{-2x}y][/tex]

Does the `dx` mean that the y turns into x?

I know i have to use the product rule.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi James889! :smile:

No, you just write "dy/dx" …

d/dx ( f(x)y) = f'(x)y + f(x)dy/dx :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi James889! :smile:

No, you just write "dy/dx" …

d/dx ( f(x)y) = f'(x)y + f(x)dy/dx :wink:

Hm?, what do you mean `just write`?

I can't think of anyone i hate more than Wilhelm Leibniz, for coming up with this stupid notation :mad:
 
James889 said:
Hm?, what do you mean `just write`?

I can't think of anyone i hate more than Wilhelm Leibniz, for coming up with this stupid notation :mad:

he he, get used to it! :biggrin:

(it's particularly useful when you start using substitution of variables in integals)

of course, you could write " y' " instead. :wink:
 
James889 said:
I can't think of anyone i hate more than Wilhelm Leibniz, for coming up with this stupid notation :mad:
Personally, I prefer Leibniz notation over Newton's notation as being more informative. The notation dy/dx is lots more informative than, say y' inasmuch as the Leibniz notation tells you exactly which variable with which differentiation is with respect to.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K