How do I evaluate this triple integral for 2ze^(-x^2) over the given bounds?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the triple integral of the function 2ze^(-x^2) over the specified bounds: dy from 0 to x, dx from 0 to 1, and dz from 1 to 4. Participants suggest using the substitution u = x^2 to simplify the integration process. The integral is transformed into a product of two separate integrals, allowing for easier computation. The final expression involves integrating z from 1 to 4 and e^(-u) from 0 to 1, leading to a definitive solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of triple integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with substitution methods in integration
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties
  • Basic skills in evaluating definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of substitution in multiple integrals
  • Learn about evaluating triple integrals with varying bounds
  • Explore the properties of exponential decay functions
  • Practice problems involving integration by parts and substitution
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and integral evaluation, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching of integration techniques.

harpazo
Messages
208
Reaction score
16
Evaluate the triple integral.

Let S S S = triple integral

The function given is 2ze^(-x^2)

We are integrating over dydxdz.

Bounds pertaining to dy: 0 to x

Bounds pertaining to dx: 0 to 1

Bounds pertaining to dz: 1 to 4

S S S 2ze^(-x^2) dydxdz

S S 2yze^(-x^2) from y = 0 to y = x dxdz

S S 2xze^(-x^2) dxdz

I am stuck here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you can continue by making the sub $u=x^2$.
 
greg1313 said:
It looks like you can continue by making the sub $u=x^2$.

You mean u = -x^2 not x^2, right?
 
Harpazo said:
You mean u = -x^2 not x^2, right?

You could use either one, however, I would use the substitution suggested by Greg because then you already have the needed differential without adding a negative sign both within the differential and in the integrand or equivalently, in front of the integral (which would allow you to reverse the now "backwards" limits of integration). However, either substitution will get you to the correct answer. :D
 
MarkFL said:
You could use either one, however, I would use the substitution suggested by Greg because then you already have the needed differential without adding a negative sign both within the differential and in the integrand or equivalently, in front of the integral (which would allow you to reverse the now "backwards" limits of integration). However, either substitution will get you to the correct answer. :D

Ok. You know best.
 
Let, as suggested, u= x^2. Then du= 2xdx so that (1/2)du= x dx. When x= 0, u= 0 and when x= 1, u= 1.

The integral becomes \int_1^4\int_0^1 zxe^{-x^2}dxdz= \left(\int_1^4 z dz\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 e^{-u} du\right)
 
It is an interesting problem all around.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K