MHB How do I get the book's answer for finding the area of a gable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xyz_1965
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
xyz_1965
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
Good morning everyone. I'm working on some right-triangle trigonometry problems in the Cohen textbook as I wait to receive my Sullivan precalculus book. It should arrive next week.

Suppose that theta = 39.4° and x = 43.0 feet. Find h and round answer to one decimal place.

I found h to be 27.3 feet.

The gable is the triangular region bounded by the rafters and the attic floor. Find the area of the gable. Round the final answer to one decimal place.

Before calculating the area, I needed to find the radius, which turns out to be 33.2 feet.

I then used A = (1/2)(base)(height).
My answer is 906.4 ft^2.
The book's answer is 906.9 ft^2.
How do I get the book's answer?

20200731_105122.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't use the word "radius" since there is no circle. I presume you mean half the base of the gable. Yes, the height is the "opposite side" of a right triangle with angle 39.4 degrees and hypotenuse 43 feet. h= 43*sin(39.4)= 27.3 feet rounded to one decimal place. One half the base is b= 43*cos(39.4)= 33.2 feet.

The area of the gable is (27.3)(33.2)= 906.4 square feet, not 906.7
 
$A = \dfrac{1}{2} \cdot 43^2 \cdot \sin[180 - 2(39.4)] \approx 906.9 \, ft^2$
 
Country Boy said:
I wouldn't use the word "radius" since there is no circle. I presume you mean half the base of the gable. Yes, the height is the "opposite side" of a right triangle with angle 39.4 degrees and hypotenuse 43 feet. h= 43*sin(39.4)= 27.3 feet rounded to one decimal place. One half the base is b= 43*cos(39.4)= 33.2 feet.

The area of the gable is (27.3)(33.2)= 906.4 square feet, not 906.7

Thank you very much. Yes, I meant to say half the base of the gable not radius. Please, read my next thread in the Chat Room and reply.
 
skeeter said:
$A = \dfrac{1}{2} \cdot 43^2 \cdot \sin[180 - 2(39.4)] \approx 906.9 \, ft^2$

Simply put. Please, read my next thread in the Chat Room and reply.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top