How do I incorporate theta into the momentum equation for Fluids homework?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Momentum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on incorporating the angle theta into the momentum equation for fluid dynamics homework, specifically using the equation \(\sum(\dot{m}\vec{v})_{exit}-\sum(\dot{m}\vec{v})_{inlet}=\sum F_{ext}\). The user visualizes the flow splitting around a wedge's horizontal axis of symmetry, proposing to divide the wedge into upper and lower right triangles with angles of \(\frac{\theta}{2}\). The conversation emphasizes resolving the momentum equation into Cartesian coordinates and clarifies the use of mass flow rate per unit width instead of per unit area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles, particularly conservation of momentum.
  • Familiarity with Cartesian coordinate systems and vector resolution.
  • Knowledge of mass flow rate calculations in fluid mechanics.
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically dealing with angles in triangles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the conservation of momentum in fluid dynamics.
  • Learn about resolving forces and velocities in Cartesian coordinates.
  • Research mass flow rate calculations for non-pipe flow scenarios.
  • Explore the implications of using angles in fluid mechanics problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, particularly those tackling complex momentum equations and seeking to improve their understanding of flow behavior around geometric shapes.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



Picture1-35.png


Homework Equations


\sum(\dot{m}\vec{v})_{exit}-\sum(\dot{m}\vec{v})_{inlet}=\sum F_{ext}


I only know that this is cons of momentum because my prof told us. I am having a hard time visualizing how to incorporate THETA into the above equation since it is not a nice right triangle.

I am thinking that since the exit velocities are equal, than the inlet flow must be being split about the wedges horizontal axis of symmetry.

Thus, I think I can divide the wedge into an "upper" and "lower" right triangle whose angle wrt to the horizontal is \frac{\theta}{2}.

Then I can resolve the momentum eq into Cartesian coordinates.

Sound good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds lovely!
 
Nice! I guess that what is confusing me now, is why they gave me
force/unit length into page

But I am just going to start plugging in and see what happens.
 
Saladsamurai said:
I guess that what is confusing me now, is why they gave me
force/unit length into page
Consider it to be an arbitrarily wide sheet of water. Use momentum per unit length as well.
 
Doc Al said:
Consider it to be an arbitrarily wide sheet of water. Use momentum per unit length as well.

Okay, so the m-1 just drops out anyway, and this problem reduces to regular cons of mom
 
Yep.
 
Thanks! 83.4 degrees sounds reasonable I think :smile:
 
Saladsamurai said:
83.4 degrees sounds reasonable I think
Show how you got that answer.
 
Picture2-21.png
 
  • #10
Rethink your result for m, the mass flow rate. You want it to be mass flow per unit width (or depth).
 
  • #11
I am not sure that I follow. Errr... Okay. So that inlet with the 4 cm dimension is NOT a PIPE...right?

It is a "sheet" with area 4cm*WIDTH. Thus my, mass flow rate should be, with h=4cm:

\dot{m}=\rho V (h*W)\Rightarrow \frac{\dot{m}}{W}=\rho Vh

Am I with you now?
 
  • #12
Now you're cooking.
 
  • #13
Typical 'not-paying-attention' mistake. Perhaps I should turn off Band of Brothers while I do my studies? :smile:

Thanks Doc!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K