Comparing Generalised Momentum Calculations for Central Force Problems

WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement



I have an issue with understanding the idea of generalised momentum for the Lagrangian.

For a central force problem, the Lagrangian is given by,
$$L = \frac{1}{2}m(\dot{r} ^2 + p^2 \dot{\phi ^2}) - U(r)$$
with ##r## being radial distance.

The angular momentum is then,
$$P_{\phi} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}} = mr^2\dot{\phi}$$

Without the Lagrangian, I would have started with,
$$P_{\phi} = \vec{r} \times \vec{P}$$
$$|P_{\phi}| = rP\sin (\theta)$$
$$|P_{\phi}| = rmv \sin (\theta)$$
with ##\theta## being the angle between the two vectors, which I think can be reduced with the equation
$$v = r\dot{\phi}$$
and angular momentum is,
$$|P_{\phi}| = mr^2 \dot{\phi} \sin (\theta)$$
which varies significantly.

Could someone kindly
a) Explain the errors in my assumptions
b) Explain how I should have altered my "Newtonian" working in order to derive the same result as the Lagrangian method?

Thanks!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
on Phys.org
v = rφ' is true only when the v and r vectors are perpendicular, as in circular motion. More generally, rφ' = v sinθ.
 
mjc123 said:
v = rφ' is true only when the v and r vectors are perpendicular, as in circular motion. More generally, rφ' = v sinθ.

Hi, thanks for the response.

But this means that the particle in the Lagrangian problem has to be moving in a circular motion, which needn't be the case, no?
 
No, the Lagrangian is general (as shown by the term in r'2, which is 0 for circular motion.)
 
mjc123 said:
No, the Lagrangian is general (as shown by the term in r'2, which is 0 for circular motion.)

Do you mind explaining why ##v\sin \theta = r \dot{\phi}##?

Thank you.
 
diagram.png

Hope this helps
 

Attachments

  • diagram.png
    diagram.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 815
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWCY
mjc123 said:
View attachment 215433
Hope this helps

If you want to compare those two ways of calculating the momentum you need to express ##\vec{r} \times \vec{P}## completely in terms of ##r## and ##\phi## and their derivatives. Putting in the extra angle ##\theta## makes it hard to compare them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K