How do I prove Lorentz Invariance using 4-vectors?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


I'm asked to prove that Et - p⋅r = E't' - p'⋅r'

Homework Equations


t = γ (t' + ux')
x = γ (x' + ut')
y = y'
z = z'

E = γ (E' + up'x)
px = γ (p'x + uE')
py = p'y
pz = p'z

The Attempt at a Solution


Im still trying to figure out 4 vectors. I get close to the solution but I have some values hanging around.
For the first two terms, E and t, i just multiple them out.
(γ (E' + up'x))(γ (t' + ux') )

Next I work with the p and r. The way i understand them is that that p is equal to the three different equations i have listed for px,py, and pz. And the same thing for r but with x,y, and z. I am guessing that because i don't a lorentz transformation formula for just p or r.

I then multiply px with x, py with y, and pz with z. adding the products of each along the way.

am i on the right track? I start canceling terms but ultimately I'm left with a γ2ut'uE' and γ2ux'up'. I'm also left with a bunch of γ2's.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i just figured it out. the squared gamma factor helps me get rid of the left over terms. i forgot that gamma was something more than just a variable.