How do I show sin 1 + sin 2 + sin 3 + diverges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter incubusfan723
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sin
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the series sin 1 + sin 2 + sin 3 + ... and the task of demonstrating that it diverges. Participants explore the nature of the sine function and its implications for the convergence of the series.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the behavior of the series, noting that if the terms do not approach zero, the sum may not settle down, suggesting divergence. Others express an intuitive understanding of the oscillatory nature of the sine function but struggle to formalize this in a proof.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided various insights and references to convergence tests, including the Nth Term Test for Divergence. There is acknowledgment of the oscillatory behavior of the series and its implications for divergence, though no explicit consensus has been reached on a formal proof.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the arguments of the sine function are not even fractions of π, which may affect convergence. Additionally, there is mention of the range of the sine function and its impact on the series' behavior.

incubusfan723
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I was given the series sin 1 + sin 2 + sin 3 + sin 4 + ... and I must show that it diverges. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to how to go about doing this?




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the parts of a series never reach zero, wouldn't you keep adding chunks, so the sum never settles down(never converges - it diverges)?
 
I understand it intuitively that the sum is never going to settle down due to the nature of the function, but I'm having a hard time putting that concept into a formal proof.
 
xcvxcvvc said:
If the parts of a series never reach zero, wouldn't you keep adding chunks, so the sum never settles down(never converges - it diverges)?

Note that the range of sin(x) is -1 to 1. So if you picked the arguments to the sin(x) function correctly, you could get the sum to not diverge.

The hard part of this qestion is that the x values are not an even fraction of PI...
 
berkeman said:
Looks like the first rule only applies for summands > 0. Good link, though. Time for some reading...

Or more accurately, the first rule is talking about converging, as opposed to not diverging, which the OP is asking about.
 
No, berkeman. The summand in this case is sin(n), and the limit of sin(n) as n goes to infinity is undefined. Therefore, the series does not converge.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
No, berkeman. The summand in this case is sin(n), and the limit of sin(n) as n goes to infinity is undefined. Therefore, the series does not converge.

- Warren

I totally agree it does not converge. But the OP said the problem was to show that it diverges. The sum can oscillate without diverging.

I just did a quick Excel check to get a feel for what the sum does. After 100 terms, it's not obvious that it will diverge...
 
  • #10
chroot said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergence_tests

The first rule should suffice.

- Warren

this is the right answer. to show it, take the limit of sin(x) as x approaches infinity (which is undefined)

berkeman said:
Note that the range of sin(x) is -1 to 1. So if you picked the arguments to the sin(x) function correctly, you could get the sum to not diverge.

The hard part of this qestion is that the x values are not an even fraction of PI...

the only way an infinite series of sine could converge is if each piece equaled zero. for example, the series of sin(k) when k = pi and k increased by 2pi each time. (0 + 0 + 0... adds up to 0)
 
  • #11
What they refer to in the wiki article as "Limit of the summand" is similar to one that appears in some calculus texts, the Nth Term Test for Divergence. I.e., in a series [itex]\sum a_n[/itex], if lim an is not zero, the series diverges.

A common mistake that students make happens when they find that lim an = 0, and conclude that [itex]\sum a_n[/itex] converges.
 
  • #12
After 500 terms, the running series sum is spending more time positive than negative, but the highest it's getting is just under 2.
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
What they refer to in the wiki article as "Limit of the summand" is similar to one that appears in some calculus texts, the Nth Term Test for Divergence. I.e., in a series [itex]\sum a_n[/itex], if lim an is not zero, the series diverges.

A common mistake that students make happens when they find that lim an = 0, and conclude that [itex]\sum a_n[/itex] converges.

yeah, lol. i remember people confused about the topic. i just giggled inside.


if i am mad, my face is red. :mad:

i am not mad, so my face must not be red :D

wait, what about when a cute girl walks my way :blushing:
 
  • #14
Can an Euler-type sum help?

S_n=sin 1 + sin 2 + sin 3 + sin 4 + ... +sin n
S_n=sin n + sin (n-1) + sin (n-2) + sin (n-3) + ... +sin 1

2S_n= (sin 1 + sin n) + (sin 2 + sin (n-1) ) +... + (sin n + sin 1)

Then, use sin a+sin b identities to get a closed form expression.
Study n -> infty.
 
  • #15
berkeman said:
The sum can oscillate without diverging.

At least in the mathematical sense, oscillation is a form of divergence, because the series sum never settles down to any specific value. The nth term test is all that's needed to show that this series diverges. I've even heard this called the "hurdle test" by math teachers, because if it doesn't pass this hurdle, it cannot converge, and there's no need to check anything else.

- Warren
 
  • #16
chroot said:
At least in the mathematical sense, oscillation is a form of divergence, because the series sum never settles down to any specific value. The nth term test is all that's needed to show that this series diverges. I've even heard this called the "hurdle test" by math teachers, because if it doesn't pass this hurdle, it cannot converge, and there's no need to check anything else.

- Warren
I agree completely. A series doesn't have to have sums that become ever larger or ever more negative to diverge.
 
  • #18
You can also evaluate:

[tex]S(N)=\sum_{n=0}^{N}\sin(n) = \text{Im}\sum_{n=0}^{N}\exp(i n)=\text{Im}\frac{1-\exp[i(N+1)]}{1-\exp(i)}[/tex]

So,

S(N) = [sin(1) + sin(N) - sin(N+1)]/[2 - 2 cos(1)]

and we see that lim N to infinity of S(N) does not exist.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K