How do I show something is pathwise connected?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amanda_ou812
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the set X = {(x,y): a <= x <= b, c <= y <= d} is pathwise connected. Participants are exploring the definitions and implications of pathwise connectivity in a mathematical context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers a proof by contradiction to show that X is not pathwise connected. Other participants question the need for a continuous function connecting two points and suggest using linear paths. There is discussion about the formulation of such functions and the correct representation in mathematical terms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the nature of pathwise connectivity and the appropriate mathematical expressions needed to demonstrate it. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of linear functions to connect points, but there is still uncertainty about the correct formulation.

Contextual Notes

There is a distinction being made between connectedness and pathwise connectedness, with participants exploring how to prove one without assuming the other. The original poster's approach and the responses indicate a need for clarity on definitions and methods in the context of the problem.

amanda_ou812
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
I need to prove that X={(x,y):a<=x<=b, c<=y<=d}

I was thinking of using proof by contradiction.

Assume that X is not pathwise connected, then for a,b in X there is no continuous function that connects the two.

I can show that then the set is disconnected but not sure where to go after that.

Am I going about it the correct way?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why can't you just give the path that connects two points??

Given (x,y) and (u,v). What path can you take that connects (x,y) and (u,v)?
 
if I take a straight line path from the points, it would be the distance between the two, so sqrt((x-u)^2 + (y-v)^2)
 
I don't care about the distance. I want a function [0,1]\rightarrow X. A linear path is ok. How do you write that in function language?
 
i am not sure what you mean by function language but I would want f(0) = (x,y) and f(1) = (u, v)
 
Xhat is the equation of the line connecting your two points??
 
i want to say something like

given f(0) = (x, y) and p in [0,1] then f(p) = ((y-v)/(x-u)) * p + (x, y)

but that's not correct bc i am switching between R and R^2

do i need to make a continuous function for each component?
 
Yes, you need to go linearly drom x to u and from y to v.
 
do I do it peicewise? like f(p) = (x,y) for p=0, (u, v) for p=1 and then this other functions that I cannot figure out how to get.
 
  • #10
amanda_ou812 said:
I need to prove that X={(x,y):a<=x<=b, c<=y<=d}
You need to prove what about this set? That it is connected? Or that it is pathwise connected? A set can be "connected" without being "pathwise connected".

I was thinking of using proof by contradiction.

Assume that X is not pathwise connected, then for a,b in X there is no continuous function that connects the two.

I can show that then the set is disconnected but not sure where to go after that.

Am I going about it the correct way?

Thanks!
 
  • #11
Pathwise connected
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K