How do I solve this FODE for the particle's velocity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr bob
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in mechanics, specifically further kinematics. The scenario involves a particle moving along the positive x-axis, with its acceleration defined as a function of its displacement from the origin. The original poster, Bob, is tasked with finding the time it takes for the particle to reach a specific position given its initial conditions and acceleration characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Bob attempts to integrate the equations of motion to express velocity in terms of displacement. Other participants provide feedback on his integration steps, questioning the treatment of derivatives and suggesting alternative methods for solving the differential equation. There is discussion about the implications of the acceleration being directed towards the origin and how that affects the equations derived.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various interpretations and methods for approaching the problem. Some guidance has been provided regarding the correct formulation of the differential equation and integration techniques. Bob expresses confusion and seeks clarification on certain steps, indicating that the conversation is still active and exploratory.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves specific initial conditions and constraints, such as the particle being at rest at a certain position and the nature of the acceleration. There is also mention of discrepancies between calculated results and expected answers from a reference, highlighting the complexity of the problem.

mr bob
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hey.
I've been doing more mechanics recently - further kinematics in M3. I've come across another question I'm confused by.

A particle moves on the positive x-axis. When its displacement from O is x meters, is acceleration is of magnitude x^-3 m/s^2 and directed towards O. Given that initially, when t=0, the particle is at rest with x=1, find the time the particle takes to reach x=1/4.

First i integrate with respect to x to find:

V^2 = x^-2 + C where C = -1
v^2 = x^-2 -1

V = x^-1 - 1

Now i integrate again to find velocity as (dx/dt):

dx/dt = x^-1 - 1

Which is a FODE, however i can't solve it.

Thank you,
Bob
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mr bob said:
Hey.
I've been doing more mechanics recently - further kinematics in M3. I've come across another question I'm confused by.

A particle moves on the positive x-axis. When its displacement from O is x meters, is acceleration is of magnitude x^-3 m/s^2 and directed towards O. Given that initially, when t=0, the particle is at rest with x=1, find the time the particle takes to reach x=1/4.

First i integrate with respect to x to find:

V^2 = x^-2 + C where C = -1
v^2 = x^-2 -1

V = x^-1 - 1

Now i integrate again to find velocity as (dx/dt):

dx/dt = x^-1 - 1

Which is a FODE, however i can't solve it.

Thank you,
Bob
That isn't quite right. The problem says the acceleration is given by [itex]x^{-3}[/itex] towards the origin, so
[tex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-x^{-3}[/tex]
Multiplying by x3dt2 gives:
[tex]x^3d^2x =-dt^2[/tex]
Now integrate twice.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
That isn't quite right. The problem says the acceleration is given by [itex]x^{-3}[/itex] towards the origin, so
[tex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-x^{-3}[/tex]
Multiplying by x3dt2 gives:
[tex]x^3d^2x =-dt^2[/tex]
Now integrate twice.

No, you can't treat a second derivative like that, "differentials", dx and dy separately, are only defined for the first derivative: we could separate [itex]\frac{dv}{dt}= x^{-3}[/itex] into [itex]cv= x^{-3}dt[/itex] but then you can't integrate x-3 with respect to t.

You can do this by "quadrature" (looks to me like this is what mr bob did)- since t does not appear explicitly, let [itex]v= \frac{dx}{dt}[/itex]. Then [itex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= \frac{dv}{dt}[/itex] and, by the chain rule, [itex]\frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}= v\frac{dv}{dx}[/itex]

That makes the equation [itex]v\frac{dv}{dx}= x^{-3}[/itex] which we can separate: [itex]v dv= x^{-3}dx[/itex] and, integrating, [itex]\frac{1}{2}v^2= -\frac{1}{2}x^{-2}+ C[/itex] or [itex]v^2= -x^{-2}+ C[/itex] almost what mr bob said (he is missing the "-" as x increases the particle slows). Taking x= 1, v= 0 when t= 0, we get 0= -1+ C so C= 1 and [itex]v^2= -x^{-2}+ C[/itex] again almost as mr bob said.

However, (are you listening mr bob?) taking the square root does NOT give v= 1- x-1! [itex]\sqrt{a^2+ b^2} \ne a+ b[/itex]!

Instead [itex]v= \frac{dx}{dt}= \sqrt{1- x^{-1}}= \sqrt{\frac{x^2- 1}{x^2}}= \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}}{x}[/itex]. That separates as [itex]\frac{xdx}{x^2- 1}= dt[/itex] which should be easy to integrate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LeonhardEuler said:
That isn't quite right. The problem says the acceleration is given by [itex]x^{-3}[/itex] towards the origin, so
[tex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}=-x^{-3}[/tex]
Multiplying by x3dt2 gives:
[tex]x^3d^2x =-dt^2[/tex]
Now integrate twice.

No, you can't treat a second derivative like that: we could separate [itex]\frac{dv}{dt}= x^{-3}[/itex] into [itex]cv= x^{-3}dt[/itex] but then you can't integrat x-3 with respect to t.

You can do this by "quadrature"- since t does not appear explicitly, let [itex]v= \frac{dx}{dt}. Then [itex]\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}= \frac{dv}{dt}[/itex] and, by the chain rule, [itex]\frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}= v\frac{dv}{dx}[/itex]<br /> <br /> That makes the equation [itex]v\frac{dv}{dx}= x^{-3}[/itex] which we can separate: [itex]v dv= x^{-3}dx[/itex] and, integrating, [itex]\frac{1}{2}v^2= -\frac{1}{2}x^{-2}+ C[/itex] or [itex]v^2= -x^{-2}+ C[/itex] <b>almost</b> what mr bob said (he is missing the "-" as x increases the particle slows). Taking x= 1, v= 0 when t= 0, we get 0= -1+ C so C= 1 and [itex]v^2= 1 -x^{-2}[/itex] again almost as mr bob said.<br /> <br /> <b>However, (are you listening mr bob?) taking the square root does NOT give v= 1- x<sup>-1</sup>! [itex]\sqrt{a^2+ b^2} \ne a+ b[/itex]!<br /> <br /> Instead [itex]v= \frac{dx}{dt}= \sqrt{1- x^{-1}}= \sqrt{\frac{x^2- 1}{x^2}}= \frac{\sqrt{x^2-1}}{x}[/itex]. That separates as [itex]\frac{xdx}{\sqrt{x^2- 1}}= dt[/itex] which should be easy to integrate.</b>[/itex]
 
Thank you very much. I really appreciate the help. Some of these mechanics questions are a bit hard. Need to improve my integration skills abit.
 
I've integrated to [itex]t = \sqrt(x^2 - 1)[/itex] but can't get the answer correct. Find t when x = 1/4, which gives the root of a negative number, not real. But the book's answer is [itex]\sqrt(15)[/itex] which i notice is [itex]\sqrt(x^-2 - 1)[/itex]. How is this possible?

Thank you,
Bob
 
Last edited:
The acceleration is of magnitude x-3 and directed toward O!

I missed that myself: the differential equation is not
[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}= x^{-3}[/tex]
it is
[tex]\frac{dv}{dt}= -x^{-3}[/tex]
!

That's why you had what I (mistakenly) thought was a sign error!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
When i integrate i get [itex]t = 1 - (1 - x^2)[/itex].
I'm getting confused by this now, i think my brain's just died, ah well. Sorry for keeping asking questions, i can see how annoying it would be if the answer was so obvious yet i don't grasp it.

Thanks,
Bob
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K