MHB How Do I Solve This Garden Border Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Simonio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    garden
Simonio
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Here's another question I'm finding it hard to get started on:

" A garden is in the shape of a rectangle, 20 metres by 8 metres. Around the outside is a border of uniform width, and in the middle is a square pond. The width of the border is the same as the width of the pond. The size of the are which is NOT occupied by either border or pond is \(124m^2\). Letting the width of the border be \(xm\), derive the equation \(3x^2-56x + 36 = 0\).

The only equation I can derive is this: A (total area) = \((2x + 20)(2x + 8)\). I'm not sure how to relate the information about the square and the inner area of \(124^2m\). Any help appreciated. I'm still finding these sort of questions difficult :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, let's draw a diagram:

View attachment 2584

Now, the area we want is shaded in green. The width of this area is $20-2x$ and the length is $8-2x$. Then we need to subtract the area of the pond, which is $x^2$. Can you put this all together and equate it to $124\text{ m}^2$ to obtain the required quadratic in $x$?
 

Attachments

  • garden.jpg
    garden.jpg
    4.9 KB · Views: 134
MarkFL said:
First, let's draw a diagram:

View attachment 2584

Now, the area we want is shaded in green. The width of this area is $20-2x$ and the length is $8-2x$. Then we need to subtract the area of the pond, which is $x^2$. Can you put this all together and equate it to $124\text{ m}^2$ to obtain the required quadratic in $x$?

Thanks. Wow, I misread the meaning and thought that the 20x8 dimension was for the inner garden area -I find it's easy to get verbally confused! I'll have a go now based on your diagram -thanks a lot!
 
Ah, the importance of drawing a diagram cannot be overlooked. While a picture is never a proof, they can sure help to get the proof! (Or solution, in this case.)

Take a gander at the http://mathhelpboards.com/other-topics-22/problem-solving-strategy-28.html I've culled from various sources. It might help you out with word problems.
 
Ackbach said:
Ah, the importance of drawing a diagram cannot be overlooked. While a picture is never a proof, they can sure help to get the proof! (Or solution, in this case.)

Never a truer word said. [And for those who haven't already, and who might yet doubt the veracity of Ackbach's words, see Tristan Needham's "Visual Complex Analysis" (Heidy) ]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top