MHB How Do I Solve This Quadratic Inequality Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
To solve the quadratic inequality \(2x^2 + 4x \ge x^2 - x - 6\), the first step is to rearrange it to \(x^2 + 5x + 6 \ge 0\), which factors to \((x + 2)(x + 3) \ge 0\). The critical points are \(x = -2\) and \(x = -3\), leading to intervals where the product is non-negative. The solution is \(x \in (-\infty, -3] \cup [-2, \infty)\), indicating that the inequality holds for values less than or equal to -3 and greater than or equal to -2. Understanding the behavior of the parabola helps confirm these intervals as the regions where the expression is non-negative.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I'm working on this problem.

$$2x^2 + 4x \ge x^2 - x - 6$$

I got here

$$2x -x \ge -3$$

But I don't know how to go from here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hmm, care to show how you got there because I think you've made an error. The $x^2$ terms don't disappear in this problem. Try moving all the terms to the left hand side and tell me what you get. :)
 
beginner, having a crack at problem

$$2x^2+4x\ge x^2-x-6$$
$$\implies x^2+5x+6\ge 0$$
$$\implies (x+2)(x+3)\ge 0$$
$$\implies x \ge-2 $$
$$ or \ x \ge -3$$

I have feeling that it should be:
$$ \ or \ x \le -3$$
but don't know the reason.
Could someone please explain?
 
Last edited:
Your approach is correct until line #4. $(x + 2)(x + 3) \geq 0$ doesn't mean both of the factors $x + 2$ and $x + 3$ have to be $\geq 0$.

$a \cdot b \geq 0$ implies that either both of $a$ and $b$ are positive or both of $a$ and $b$ are negative (positive times negative is negative, so it can't be the case that one of $a, b$ is positive and another is negative).

Thus, either $x + 2 \geq 0, x + 3 \geq 0$ or $x + 2 \leq 0, x + 3 \leq 0$. In the first case we get, by rearranging, $x \geq -2, x \geq -3$ and in the second case, similarly, $x \leq -2, x \leq -3$.

Now $x \geq -2$ automatically implies $x \geq -3$, so knowing $x \leq -3$ is superfluous information : the relevant conclusion is $x \geq -2$.

Similarly, $x \leq -3$ automatically implies $x \leq -2$. So $x \leq -2$ is superfluous, and the information of interest is $x \leq -3$.

Hence, the inequality holds if and only if $x \geq -2$ or $x \leq -3$. In mathematical notation, the solution of the inequality is $x \in (-\infty, -3] \cup [-2, \infty)$.
 
Lebec said:
$$2x^2+4x\ge x^2-x-6$$
$$\implies x^2+5x+6\ge 0$$
$$\implies (x+2)(x+3)\ge 0$$
$$\implies x \ge-2 $$
$$ or \ x \ge -3$$

I have feeling that it should be:
$$ \ or \ x \le -3$$
but don't know the reason.
Could someone please explain?

Yes, you are good at:

$$(x+2)(x+3)\ge0$$

We know the expression on the left is a parabola opening up, and having roots at $x=-3,-2$. Therefore it must be non-negative on:

$$(-\infty,-3]\,\cup\,[-2,\infty)$$
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K