MHB How Do I Solve This Quadratic Inequality Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I'm working on this problem.

$$2x^2 + 4x \ge x^2 - x - 6$$

I got here

$$2x -x \ge -3$$

But I don't know how to go from here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hmm, care to show how you got there because I think you've made an error. The $x^2$ terms don't disappear in this problem. Try moving all the terms to the left hand side and tell me what you get. :)
 
beginner, having a crack at problem

$$2x^2+4x\ge x^2-x-6$$
$$\implies x^2+5x+6\ge 0$$
$$\implies (x+2)(x+3)\ge 0$$
$$\implies x \ge-2 $$
$$ or \ x \ge -3$$

I have feeling that it should be:
$$ \ or \ x \le -3$$
but don't know the reason.
Could someone please explain?
 
Last edited:
Your approach is correct until line #4. $(x + 2)(x + 3) \geq 0$ doesn't mean both of the factors $x + 2$ and $x + 3$ have to be $\geq 0$.

$a \cdot b \geq 0$ implies that either both of $a$ and $b$ are positive or both of $a$ and $b$ are negative (positive times negative is negative, so it can't be the case that one of $a, b$ is positive and another is negative).

Thus, either $x + 2 \geq 0, x + 3 \geq 0$ or $x + 2 \leq 0, x + 3 \leq 0$. In the first case we get, by rearranging, $x \geq -2, x \geq -3$ and in the second case, similarly, $x \leq -2, x \leq -3$.

Now $x \geq -2$ automatically implies $x \geq -3$, so knowing $x \leq -3$ is superfluous information : the relevant conclusion is $x \geq -2$.

Similarly, $x \leq -3$ automatically implies $x \leq -2$. So $x \leq -2$ is superfluous, and the information of interest is $x \leq -3$.

Hence, the inequality holds if and only if $x \geq -2$ or $x \leq -3$. In mathematical notation, the solution of the inequality is $x \in (-\infty, -3] \cup [-2, \infty)$.
 
Lebec said:
$$2x^2+4x\ge x^2-x-6$$
$$\implies x^2+5x+6\ge 0$$
$$\implies (x+2)(x+3)\ge 0$$
$$\implies x \ge-2 $$
$$ or \ x \ge -3$$

I have feeling that it should be:
$$ \ or \ x \le -3$$
but don't know the reason.
Could someone please explain?

Yes, you are good at:

$$(x+2)(x+3)\ge0$$

We know the expression on the left is a parabola opening up, and having roots at $x=-3,-2$. Therefore it must be non-negative on:

$$(-\infty,-3]\,\cup\,[-2,\infty)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top