MHB How Do I Solve This Quadratic Inequality Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmt1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
To solve the quadratic inequality \(2x^2 + 4x \ge x^2 - x - 6\), the first step is to rearrange it to \(x^2 + 5x + 6 \ge 0\), which factors to \((x + 2)(x + 3) \ge 0\). The critical points are \(x = -2\) and \(x = -3\), leading to intervals where the product is non-negative. The solution is \(x \in (-\infty, -3] \cup [-2, \infty)\), indicating that the inequality holds for values less than or equal to -3 and greater than or equal to -2. Understanding the behavior of the parabola helps confirm these intervals as the regions where the expression is non-negative.
tmt1
Messages
230
Reaction score
0
I'm working on this problem.

$$2x^2 + 4x \ge x^2 - x - 6$$

I got here

$$2x -x \ge -3$$

But I don't know how to go from here.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hmm, care to show how you got there because I think you've made an error. The $x^2$ terms don't disappear in this problem. Try moving all the terms to the left hand side and tell me what you get. :)
 
beginner, having a crack at problem

$$2x^2+4x\ge x^2-x-6$$
$$\implies x^2+5x+6\ge 0$$
$$\implies (x+2)(x+3)\ge 0$$
$$\implies x \ge-2 $$
$$ or \ x \ge -3$$

I have feeling that it should be:
$$ \ or \ x \le -3$$
but don't know the reason.
Could someone please explain?
 
Last edited:
Your approach is correct until line #4. $(x + 2)(x + 3) \geq 0$ doesn't mean both of the factors $x + 2$ and $x + 3$ have to be $\geq 0$.

$a \cdot b \geq 0$ implies that either both of $a$ and $b$ are positive or both of $a$ and $b$ are negative (positive times negative is negative, so it can't be the case that one of $a, b$ is positive and another is negative).

Thus, either $x + 2 \geq 0, x + 3 \geq 0$ or $x + 2 \leq 0, x + 3 \leq 0$. In the first case we get, by rearranging, $x \geq -2, x \geq -3$ and in the second case, similarly, $x \leq -2, x \leq -3$.

Now $x \geq -2$ automatically implies $x \geq -3$, so knowing $x \leq -3$ is superfluous information : the relevant conclusion is $x \geq -2$.

Similarly, $x \leq -3$ automatically implies $x \leq -2$. So $x \leq -2$ is superfluous, and the information of interest is $x \leq -3$.

Hence, the inequality holds if and only if $x \geq -2$ or $x \leq -3$. In mathematical notation, the solution of the inequality is $x \in (-\infty, -3] \cup [-2, \infty)$.
 
Lebec said:
$$2x^2+4x\ge x^2-x-6$$
$$\implies x^2+5x+6\ge 0$$
$$\implies (x+2)(x+3)\ge 0$$
$$\implies x \ge-2 $$
$$ or \ x \ge -3$$

I have feeling that it should be:
$$ \ or \ x \le -3$$
but don't know the reason.
Could someone please explain?

Yes, you are good at:

$$(x+2)(x+3)\ge0$$

We know the expression on the left is a parabola opening up, and having roots at $x=-3,-2$. Therefore it must be non-negative on:

$$(-\infty,-3]\,\cup\,[-2,\infty)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top