1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Support PF! Reminder for those going back to school to buy their text books via PF Here!
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How do I teach myself precalculus up to calculus?

  1. Jul 20, 2015 #1
    What are some good textbooks, websites, question papers and other sources of information that will help me teach myself precalculus up to calculus? How long will this take until I have a good grasp of the knowledge?
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 20, 2015 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Pre-calculus is a grab-bag term for the pre-requisite subjects for learning calculus, chiefly algebra and trigonometry. No one studies pre-calculus to teach themselves pre-calculus.

    If you want to do well in calculus, study basic and college algebra, trigonometry, and brush up some on geometry.
  4. Jul 20, 2015 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    Take a look at Lang's basic mathematics. It contains everything you need to know to be able to start calculus.
  5. Jul 20, 2015 #4
    I strongly recommend "Principles of High School Mathematics" by Allendoerfer & Oakley.
  6. Jul 20, 2015 #5
    As someone in the same boat as you I would recommend Basic Mathematics by Lang, but there are many books out there that would work just fine. I enjoy his style. Build a solid foundation in algebra, geometry, and trigonometry before moving on to calculus. From my understanding, it isn't the calculus that has people scratching their heads; it is their weak grounding in basic algebra that holds them back much of the time.
  7. Jul 21, 2015 #6
    I second Principals of High School Mathematics by oakley. Axler's pre-calculus book is quite good, however, it is much harder than Lang.

    Maybe buy Oakley and Axler since both can be had for under 15 dollars.
  8. Jul 21, 2015 #7
    Do you know geometry? If not, try Harold Jacobs Geometry : 1st or 2nd edition. avoid the 3rd.
  9. Jul 30, 2015 #8
    Just go through AoPS Intermediate Algebra, Precalculus, and perhaps intro to geometry. You'll be set. Note: aops precalc only covers linear algebra and trig, but intermediate algebra covers the other things like conics, functions, etc.
  10. Jul 30, 2015 #9
    Those books teach tricks instead of understanding. Books from Lang, Oakly, Axler, and Simmons are superior. You are not going to say that Jacobs combined with Kiselev is not better than AoPS geometry book.
  11. Jul 30, 2015 #10
    If you don't mind me asking, what is the name of the book by Oakley that you're talking about? I can't find a "Principles of High School Mathematics" by Oakley, but I did find a "Principles of Mathematics" book. Is this what you're talking about?
  12. Jul 30, 2015 #11
    You are correct. I would pm Mathwonk, to see which edition is the better one. This is a book you will keep on your book shelf.
  13. Jul 30, 2015 #12
    If you think that AoPS only teaches "tricks", I HIGHLY recommend you read the books. Their entire point is rigor, intuition, and application. They assemble the most challenging and versatile material for the gifted student...
  14. Jul 30, 2015 #13
    They are just tricks. Any decent book beats AoPS. Have you read Kiselev? Compare Kiselev to AoPS geometry book. Which one is better written, concise, and rigorous?

    You are comparing AoPS with generic 1000 page run of the mill, glossy paged textbooks. Yes, AoPS are better than those. HOWEVER, AoPS are expensive, do not dive into the theory, as say, kiselev or axler will. AoPS reminds me of Schaum's outlines. Good to feed one's belly but not fill one's hunger.

    You sound like a shill judging fro
  15. Jul 30, 2015 #14
    If he needs to be prepared for calculus, AoPS is MORE than enough. There's a reason AoPS has the biggest online olympiad math community, and there's a reason olympiad style math is coveted so highly-it enforces true understanding and application. Note that 'style' is bolded; the very topics of olympiads like functional equations may not be necessary, but many of the fundamentals are crucial to success in further mathematics ventures.
  16. Jul 30, 2015 #15
    Looking back on what you are saying, I still think you are a bit flawed, but AoPS does take a slightly casual, less rigorous approach. Such an approach is found in different, more classical texts. However, I think AoPS is great for the gifted student shooting to learn challenging, olympiad style, and applicable material at a fundamental level, later revisiting some of the ideas with further rigour.

    Sorry to make such a big discussion :P
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: How do I teach myself precalculus up to calculus?