How do irrational numbers play a role in physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of irrational numbers in physics, particularly in relation to physical constants and powers. Participants explore the implications of these numbers and their potential connections to established scientific concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Justin, proposes theories regarding the relationship between the size of powers in physics and the first fraction of an irrational number, expressing curiosity about its relevance to current scientific understanding.
  • Another participant requests clarification on Justin's theories, indicating a lack of understanding of the concepts presented.
  • Justin questions how physicists view irrational numbers, suggesting a potential link between rationality in physics and the nature of irrational numbers.
  • Justin presents specific examples involving powers of numbers like 1.7 and 1.6, suggesting they relate to irrational numbers and physical constants, but acknowledges uncertainty about their significance.
  • A later reply challenges the allowance of speculation or personal theories within the discussion, indicating a boundary on the types of contributions considered acceptable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus, as there are differing levels of understanding and acceptance of the speculative theories presented. Some participants express confusion, while others challenge the validity of personal theories.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of clarity in Justin's theories, which depend on specific interpretations of irrational numbers and their application in physics. The discussion also reflects a tension between exploratory ideas and the forum's guidelines on speculation.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in the intersection of mathematics and physics, particularly those curious about the implications of irrational numbers in scientific theories.

bhpv
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have some theories about physical facts derived from the size of powers in physics, compared to the first fraction of an irrational number.

I do not know if this is redundant with present day science, but I am curious about it.

Regards,
Justin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bhpv said:
Hi,
I have some theories about physical facts derived from the size of powers in physics, compared to the first fraction of an irrational number.

I do not know if this is redundant with present day science, but I am curious about it.

Regards,
Justin

Could you possibly be just a little more vague? I almost have some tiny idea of what you might be talking about, but not really.
 
bhpv said:
Hi,
I have some theories about physical facts derived from the size of powers in physics, compared to the first fraction of an irrational number.

I do not know if this is redundant with present day science, but I am curious about it.

Regards,
Justin

I've always wondered what physicists, who are nothing if not rational, think about irrational numbers. Do your theories shed some light on this?
 
Hi,

It is rational but not proven by me, nor do I know if it is profound.i.e.:
1.7 ^-27

2.7.. is e.
.

1.6 ^-19

1.6.. is natural constant (golden ration)
Both these numbers with both high power come from physics.
So why should they not correspond to the irrational number?I do not know the anwer to this, and so not what physicists might do with such numbers.
 
Sorry, bhpv, we don't allow speculation or personal theories here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K