What is the role of complex numbers in physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the role of complex numbers in physics, exploring their applications in various fields such as electrical engineering, quantum mechanics, and oscillatory systems. Participants share insights on how complex numbers simplify mathematical problems and enhance understanding in these areas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that complex numbers are used in electrical impedance problems, which can simplify calculations by avoiding differential equations.
  • Others mention the application of complex numbers in the solutions of underdamped harmonic oscillators, highlighting their presence in exponential forms.
  • Complex numbers are described as useful mathematical tools in various physics and engineering problems, including electrical, control theory, and quantum theory.
  • One participant discusses the significance of complex numbers in representing angles and trigonometric relationships, particularly in oscillatory problems.
  • Another participant emphasizes the concept of "closure" in the complex number system, stating that every complex number has a square root, which is not the case in the real number system.
  • There is a mention of the transformation from time to frequency domain using complex numbers, which simplifies the mathematics involved in oscillatory systems.
  • A historical note is made regarding Wessel's discovery of the geometric interpretation of the imaginary unit as a unit length at a 90-degree angle to the real axis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the utility of complex numbers in simplifying mathematical problems in physics, but there are varying perspectives on specific applications and interpretations. The discussion remains open with multiple viewpoints presented.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on definitions of complex numbers and the unresolved mathematical steps in the proofs and explanations provided by participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and professionals in physics, engineering, and mathematics, particularly those exploring the applications of complex numbers in their fields.

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
In my math class, were having presentations about any topic from our curriculum. I want to talk about Complex numbers role in physics, but i don't know anything about its role. Can anyone tell me some areas were its important/used;) I know Feynman used them, but i don't know why. Anybody know something?

Thanks;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the solution of an underdamped harmonic oscillator in (see page 2):

http://www.brynmawr.edu/physics/DJCross/docs/misc/dho.pdf

The general form of the solution is an exponential with a complex number argument:
[tex]x(t)=Ae^{\left(-a\pm i\omega \right)t}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Complex numbers are numbers in the plane and can be a useful mathematical tool in many physics and engineering problems and theories (electrical, control theory, and quantum theory). In fact, you can have complex number in higher dimensions - an infinite number in fact (ex: 3d quaternion) where i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = -1. However, you do not combine them: a + bi + cj + dk != a + (b + c + d)i and the multiplication of two quaternions is noncommutative. Quaternions can be useful in making 3d video games because of the way they work.

All in all, putting complex numbers on the complex plane was the biggest discovery I think when someone found that i = 1 /_ 90-degrees. As such, complex numbers can embody angles/trigonometry and can be employed in problems involving oscillations/frequency. Often, in engineering, the laplace transform is taken of your mass-spring-damper system (or other type of system) to change t (time) into i*w (frequency). This is a neat trick that greatly simplifies the mathematics.
 
i = 1 /_ 90-degrees

What does the underscore represent?
 
Sorry I was trying to draw an angle symbol, i = 1 "angle" 90°

In other words, the imaginary axis is perpendicular to the real axis.
 
johann1301 said:
In my math class, were having presentations about any topic from our curriculum. I want to talk about Complex numbers role in physics, but i don't know anything about its role. Can anyone tell me some areas were its important/used;) I know Feynman used them, but i don't know why. Anybody know something?

Thanks;)

Complex numbers are really good with oscillating systems, like waves or oscillators. Quantum mechanics would be really messy without complex numbers. Electromagnetic radiation (light, radio waves, etc) uses complex numbers.

The main thing about complex numbers is "closure". For example, the square root is not "closed" in the real number system. That means that there are some real numbers that you cannot take the square root of, like -1. In the complex number system, the square root is "closed". Every complex number has a square root.

More generally, if x^y are real numbers, there are some real numbers for which this expression has no answer. In the complex number system, every expression of the form x^y gives a complex number. This makes the math really simple, every time you run into x^y, you don't have to worry about whether it exists or not. It always does.

Thats why it works so well in many physics problems. If you do the physics in complex numbers, you can do the simplified math, and when you get your result, if you did it right, that result will be a real number.
 
Very well said Rap!

Oh, I want to add one thing... when you transform t --> i*w, you will often see this as "s". So do not be confused because s = i*w

t: time domain
s: frequency domain (much simpler mathematics for problems that involve oscillations like alternating current or quantum wave functions)
 
Last edited:
It was Wessel who discovered that √-1 is the unit length 90° to the real axis.

The proof goes like this:

Since I do not have an "angle" symbol, I will use "<" to mean angle.

Imagine (no pun intended) that there is a line segment with length L and direction θ that represents √-1.

In other words, √-1 = L < θ

If you square both sides, you get: -1 = L*L < 2θ

Now, we know from the unit circle that: -1 = 1 < 180°

The LHS of both these equations are the same! L*L < 2θ = 1 < 180°

Therefore, L = 1 and 2θ = 180° --> θ = 90°

Plug this back into our first equation and we find √-1 = 1 < 90° !

So i = √-1 is the "unit" of length that is perpendicular to the real axis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K