How Do Monoclinic to Triclinic Lattice Transformations Occur?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bebis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The transformation from monoclinic to triclinic crystal structures is defined by specific lattice parameter equations: a(T) = 1/2 a(M) - 1/2 b(M), b(T) = 1/2 a(M) + 1/2 b(M), and c(T) = c(M), where T and M denote Triclinic and Monoclinic, respectively. These formulas originate from the paper 'PRL 99, 247211 (2007)', titled 'Magnetoelastic Coupling and Symmetry Breaking in the Frustrated Antiferromagnet NaMnO2'. To visualize these transformations, utilizing 3D modeling software such as AutoCAD is recommended for numerical analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monoclinic and triclinic crystal structures
  • Familiarity with lattice parameters and their significance in crystallography
  • Basic knowledge of 3D modeling software, specifically AutoCAD
  • Access to scientific literature, particularly crystallography research papers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the paper 'PRL 99, 247211 (2007)' for detailed insights on lattice transformations
  • Learn how to construct and manipulate crystal lattices using AutoCAD
  • Explore additional resources on crystallography to deepen understanding of lattice parameters
  • Investigate other crystal structure transformations for comparative analysis
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in crystallography, materials scientists, and engineers involved in crystal structure analysis and modeling will benefit from this discussion.

bebis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
According to the literature, when monoclinic crystal structure transforms to triclinic, the following formulaes, regarding their lattice parameters are valid:

a(T) = 1/2 a(M) - 1/2 b(M)
b(T) = 1/2 a(M) + 1/2 b(M)
c(T) = c(M)

Where T and M stand for Triclinic and Monoclinic, respectively.

Could anyone please inform how do these formulaes come up or any literature source to search further?

Thanks a lot!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This looks like it might be a transformation from a face-centered monoclinic to a triclinic. One way to check would be to contruct the lattice on some 3D modeling software (like AutoCAD), and perform the transformations numerically.

What is your source for the relations?
 
The source is 'PRL 99, 247211 (2007)', 'Magnetoelastic Coupling and Symmetry Breaking
in the Frustrated Antiferromagnet -NaMnO2'. The formulas are presented on the last page, page 4, of this paper.

Any response is kindly welcome.


Gokul43201 said:
This looks like it might be a transformation from a face-centered monoclinic to a triclinic. One way to check would be to contruct the lattice on some 3D modeling software (like AutoCAD), and perform the transformations numerically.

What is your source for the relations?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K