How Do Photons Influence Our Vision Through Quantum Wave Properties?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter durant35
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature Photon Wave
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the influence of photons and their wave properties on human vision, exploring how light interacts with the eyes and how this relates to quantum mechanics and classical electrodynamics. Participants examine the nature of photons, their role in vision, and the implications of quantum theory in understanding light propagation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that photons have wave properties, allowing them to traverse multiple paths simultaneously, raising questions about how individual photons convey information about objects.
  • Others argue that images in the eyes are not formed from single photons, suggesting a more complex interaction involving many photons.
  • A participant emphasizes the need for precision in discussing how light connects the observer to the object, noting that photons are reflected and absorbed by objects before reaching the eyes.
  • There is a suggestion that understanding light and vision requires a different model than the one typically used, with classical electrodynamics providing a framework for describing light as electromagnetic waves before considering photons.
  • Some participants express confusion about the probabilistic nature of photons and how this relates to the deterministic behavior of light in special relativity.
  • It is mentioned that the classical limit of quantum electrodynamics aligns with classical electrodynamics, implying that classical descriptions are valid under certain conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of the discussion, with some participants suggesting that photons may complicate the understanding of light in this context.
  • There is a discussion about the applicability of Maxwell's equations across different timescales, with some participants asserting that light behaves classically regardless of the timescale, except for specially prepared nonclassical light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of photons, their role in vision, and the applicability of quantum mechanics versus classical electrodynamics. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the best model to describe these phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of wave and particle behavior, the complexity of quantum mechanics, and the potential confusion arising from the introduction of photons in discussions that may be adequately described by classical theories.

durant35
Messages
292
Reaction score
11
I red that photon has wave properties so it can go through both slits simultaneously in the double slit experimen.
What about photons that hit our eyes and construct our vision? How do we know which path they traveled and what they reflected, or to say it better how would you describe the propagation of light with respect to our eyes in quantum terms? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Images in your eyes are not created from single photons.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
So wave of light with billions of photons can be said to connect my eyes with the object I am perceiving?
 
durant35 said:
So wave of light with billions of photons can be said to connect my eyes with the object I am perceiving?

You need to be more precise with what, in this context, you mean by connect.

Generally photons are reflected, absorbed and emitted by objects, and as they impinge on the eyes our brain decodes that as an object.

Thanks
Bill
 
By that I mean a photon has a wave nature which makes it travel in all possible directions at once. So how can we know what do indvidual photons represent if they may pick up information from more than one thing, and how do we know that the light that strikes our eyes directly connects us with the object since an individual photon has wave nature and travels many paths?
 
durant35 said:
By that I mean a photon has a wave nature which makes it travel in all possible directions at once. So how can we know what do indvidual photons represent if they may pick up information from more than one thing, and how do we know that the light that strikes our eyes directly connects us with the object since an individual photon has wave nature and travels many paths?
Photons aren't what you think they are. They don't travel in the sense that you're using the word; I can use a wave equation to calculate the probability of finding a photon at a given position if I look there but that doesn't mean they "have a wave nature"; and although I calculate probabilities on all paths that doesn't mean the photon actually takes all paths.

To understand light and vision, you need a different model. Ordinary classical no-QM electrodynamics says that light is electromagnetic radiation, traveling waves in the electrical and magnetic fields in a given region of space. Some of these light waves are reflected from (or emitted by) the object that you're looking at; these ordinary boring classical no-QM waves enter your eyes and strike your retina. Only then do photons come into the picture: when electromagnetic radiation interacts with matter (in this case, your eyes) it always delivers its energy in discrete unit at a single point. Whenever a bit of energy is delivered to a particular spot we say "a photon hit there", and the probability of a photon hitting at a given point is proportional to the intensity of the electromagnetic radiation at that point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: entropy1
Nugatory said:
Photons aren't what you think they are. They don't travel in the sense that you're using the word; I can use a wave equation to calculate the probability of finding a photon at a given position if I look there but that doesn't mean they "have a wave nature"; and although I calculate probabilities on all paths that doesn't mean the photon actually takes all paths.

To understand light and vision, you need a different model. Ordinary classical no-QM electrodynamics says that light is electromagnetic radiation, traveling waves in the electrical and magnetic fields in a given region of space. Some of these light waves are reflected from (or emitted by) the object that you're looking at; these ordinary boring classical no-QM waves enter your eyes and strike your retina. Only then do photons come into the picture: when electromagnetic radiation interacts with matter (in this case, your eyes) it always delivers its energy in discrete unit at a single point. Whenever a bit of energy is delivered to a particular spot we say "a photon hit there", and the probability of a photon hitting at a given point is proportional to the intensity of the electromagnetic radiation at that point.

Thanks for the effort but it seems way too complex for me to understand. I may shorten my question, considering that photons distribute as probability waves how can I know that the light that represents the object and hits my eyes really represents the object since photons can be found anywhere. In SR the light reflects of the object and hits my eyes in a deterministic way, what's different here and how do we know that light actually represents what we see if it is based on probability
 
We know it because the classical limit of quantum electrodynamics gives you back classical electrodynamics. You are back to the classical description.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
Orodruin said:
We know it because the classical limit of quantum electrodynamics gives you back classical electrodynamics. You are back to the classical description.

Ok, thanks. So what are the conditions? Macroscopic objects and much light reflected from them?
 
  • #10
durant35 said:
Thanks for the effort but it seems way too complex for me to understand.
Then you can further simplify it: Just stop reading at the point where I said "Only then do photons come into the picture...". You've confused yourself because you're trying to explain what's going on in terms of photons.

The only reason to ever introduce photons into any discussion of light is because you want to understand some uniquely quantum effects; otherwise you're just making an easy problem difficult. There aren't any uniquely quantum effects in the question you're asking in this thread, so no need to think in terms of photons at all.
 
  • #11
Thank you Nugatory for the clarification and your patience.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: entropy1
  • #12
So at any instant we can desribe the behavior and propagation of the light with classical electrodynamics, time isn't a factor here? No matter how low we go on the timescale light will still behave classicaly?
 
  • #13
durant35 said:
No matter how low we go on the timescale light will still behave classicaly?
At least, our well-established Maxwell's equations is mathematically valid for all time (for light which behaves classically). I don't think there are theories or observations that discriminate the applicability of Maxwell's equations for different times relative to the instant when the light was produced.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
  • #14
durant35 said:
No matter how low we go on the timescale light will still behave classically?
Ordinary light or laser light, yes. Only specially prepared light in nonclassical states will behave differently. It requires already quite some skill to create such nonclassical light.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
864
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K