How Do Quark Spin States Influence Particle Symmetry and Identification?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quarks Spin
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence of quark spin states on particle symmetry and identification, focusing on the relationship between spin, color wave-functions, and isospin. Participants explore theoretical aspects of quark states, including symmetric and antisymmetric configurations, and their implications for particle classification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that two quarks in an S=1 state can be represented as either ##|\uparrow \uparrow \rangle## or ##|\downarrow \downarrow \rangle##, while others mention the symmetric combination ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( | \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + | \downarrow \uparrow \rangle \right)##.
  • There is a discussion about how spin and color wave-functions relate to the symmetry of the overall wave-function, with some suggesting that both must be either symmetric or antisymmetric to achieve a symmetric total state.
  • Participants question whether a qq pair must always be in a symmetric state (S=1) and explore the implications of different configurations, including the S=3/2 state.
  • One participant emphasizes that the color wave-function must be antisymmetric, leading to the requirement that the combined spin, space, and flavor wave-functions must be symmetric due to the fermionic nature of quarks.
  • Questions are raised about how isospin affects the symmetry of the flavor wave-function and whether a mix of antisymmetric states allows for non-symmetric configurations in the spin states.
  • There is curiosity about how different particles are distinguished based on their wave-functions, particularly in the context of quark combinations like qqu.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the relationship between spin states and symmetry, with no clear consensus on whether the qq pair must always be in a symmetric state or how isospin influences the flavor wave-function. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these factors for particle identification.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the wave-function configurations and the potential for confusion in understanding the requirements for symmetry in different contexts. There are references to specific mathematical formulations and states, but no exhaustive list of wave-functions has been provided.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
If two quarks are in a S=1 state, are they in either

##|\uparrow \uparrow \rangle ## or ## |\downarrow \downarrow \rangle ## ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes I forgot and the other, symm. ## \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( | \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + | \downarrow \uparrow \rangle \right) ## ...

I don't really know how to ask this question very well, but, it is how spin and color wave-functions are related to whether or not it is symmetric or not and where isospin comes into this.

If we have ## \Psi_{\text{spin}} \Psi_{\text{flavor}} ## then it seems to me that to get a symmetric wave-function here we must have either both symmetric or both anti symmetric.

I have read something that suggest that the latter is not true and that in this case we actually have a mixture of symmetric and antisymmetric states.

Given two identical quarks ## | q q u \rangle##, do you have as the symmetric color-spin wavefunction

## \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \left( |q^\uparrow q^\uparrow u^\uparrow \rangle+|q^\uparrow u^\uparrow q^\uparrow \rangle+|u^\uparrow q^\uparrow q^\uparrow \rangle \right) ## ?

Does the qq pair have to always have to be in the symmetric state ( s=1), why?The above is just ## \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} \left( |q q u \rangle+ |q u q \rangle+ |u q q \rangle\right) \otimes | \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \rangle ## isn't it?

and this refers to the S=3/2 state since all the spins are parallel, is there an analogous one for the all spin down?So it seems that all there is left to do is the case of spin 1/2 where the up quark is opposing the pair, can we have

## | q^\uparrow q^\downarrow u^\downarrow \rangle ## states? would they appear due to the symmetric ## \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( | \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + | \downarrow \uparrow \rangle \right) ##
 
Last edited:
Don't forget there is also ψcolor, and since the total color must be zero, ψcolor is always totally antisymmetric.

Since quarks are fermions, the remaining factors ψspinψspaceψflavor must together be symmetric.
 
Bill_K said:
Don't forget there is also ψcolor, and since the total color must be zero, ψcolor is always totally antisymmetric.

Since quarks are fermions, the remaining factors ψspinψspaceψflavor must together be symmetric.

Yes that was what I was attempting to get at, the color wavefunction is antisymmetric, assuming we are in l=0 we have the space wavefunction symmetric and now I am looking at the product of the spin and flavor which I require to be together symmetric and to see how many particles there are, but I think I have confused myself as to how to do this.

If it was obvious to me why the quark pair qq needed to be in the symmetric state I could model the states on the proton also,

## \chi_\text{p}(S=\frac{1}{2}, S_z=\frac{1}{2}) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} \chi_{\text{uu}}(1,1) \chi_{\text{d}}( \frac{1}{2}, -\frac{1}{2} ) - \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}} \chi_{\text{uu}}(1,0) \chi_{\text{d}}( \frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2} ) ##

Where

##\chi_{\text{uu}}(1,0) ## is the ## \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( | \uparrow \downarrow \rangle + | \downarrow \uparrow \rangle \right) ## state, where I have got the above ## \chi_{\text{p}} ## from using ladder operator on the ## \chi (S=3/2, S_z=3/2) ## (and Clebsch Gordon) ?

I think that if I could write out all of these wavefunctions in an exhaustive way then I would understand why this is all important a lot better!
 
Last edited:
I think my questions should be:

How does isospin, I, affect the symmetry of the ## \Psi_{\text{flavor}} ## wavefunction?

Spins of like quarks have to be in the S=1 state by symmetry, and for J=3/2 the spins have to be parallel. Doesn't a mix of anti-symmetric states in the spin and flavor states allow us to not use the symmetric S=1 state for the pair, qq?

How are different particles distinguished? The qq S=1 states are a triplet so for S=3/2, say, with an up quark's spin +1/2, there would be 3 different wave functions for qqu, when do different wavefunctions refer to different particles?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K