How Do Spring Constants and Resistor Formulas Compare?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ||spoon||
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights the comparison between spring constants and resistor formulas, noting that while the equations for springs in series and parallel are mathematically similar to those for resistors, they represent different physical concepts. For springs in parallel, the total force is the sum of individual forces, while for resistors in series, the total voltage is the sum of individual voltages. The confusion arises from the different physical behaviors of forces and currents, despite the similar mathematical forms. The key takeaway is that while the formulas exhibit analogous behavior, they do not imply physical similarities. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate application in experiments.
||spoon||
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Hey, i am about to undertake an EPI at school in which i will be testing the spring constants of singular springs, and then of a few springs, both in parrallel and in series.

Before i start the prac i noticed that the equations for the overall spring constant of springs in series/parrallel are opposite to the equations for resistors in series/parrallel... i.e the equation for spring constant in series is the same as that for the resistors in parrallel.

What significance does this hold, if any?

Thanks for any input

-Spoon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formulas are similar because the mathematical behavior is the same. There are no physical similarities.

For two springs in parallel, the total force is the sum of each two forces. For resistors, the total current is the sum of the two currents. Formulas are similar, but you cannot assimilate forces to currents.
 
sorry I am not sure that i understand your explanation... if the sum of the forces in parrallel for a spring is just sprinbg one plus spring 2 etc... if the resistor equation works of the same principal would the equation for resistors in parrallel also be the resistance 1 plus resistance 2...it isn't however.. 1/R total = 1/R1 + 1/R2

Could you please try and explain again I am sorry i think i have just mis understood

Thanks

Spoon
 
In the case of two springs in parallel, when you stretch the two springs of the same amount (L) the total force will be:
Ft=F1+F2= Lk1+Lk2=Lkt
Then:
kt=k1+k2
For resistors, if a current I traverse the two resistors in series the voltage at the ends of two resistors will be:
Vt=V1+V2=IR1+IR2=IRt
Then:
Rt=R1+R2
You can do the same derivation imposing a force to two springs in series and imposing a voltage to two resistors in parallel.

The formulas are similar for (springs in parallel and resistors in series) and for (springs in series and resistors in parallel)

Same mathematical behavior does not mean physical similitude.
 
Last edited:
It works for capacitors too, if you reverse 'series' and 'parallel'.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K