How Do Steady State Equations Predict Animal Population Dynamics?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mt91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States Steady
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the calculation and interpretation of steady state equations in the context of animal population dynamics. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of steady states derived from differential equations and their implications for population behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the definition of a "steady state" and its calculation, specifically referencing the equation $\frac{du*}{dt}= 0$.
  • One participant presents a cubic equation derived from the steady state condition and attempts to solve it, suggesting $u*=0$ as a potential solution.
  • Another participant challenges the interpretation of the solutions, clarifying that $u*=0$ is indeed a solution, but cautions against misinterpreting other potential solutions like $u*=1-E$ or $u*=1+E$.
  • Participants identify three steady state solutions: $u*=0$, $u*=\sqrt{1-E}$, and $u*=-\sqrt{1-E}$, with some expressing uncertainty about the implications of these solutions.
  • Questions arise regarding the biological interpretation of the steady states, particularly whether $u*=0$ indicates no population and the implications of negative steady state values.
  • One participant notes that while $u*=0$ indicates no population, a negative steady state is mathematically valid but not realistic in a biological context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical formulation of steady states but express differing views on the interpretation of the solutions, particularly regarding the biological relevance of negative values and the implications of a zero population steady state. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these steady states in population dynamics.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the biological realism of negative population values and the interpretation of steady states in a dynamic context. The mathematical steps leading to the solutions are also not fully resolved.

mt91
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
1596227733415.png

Anyone able to calculate the steady states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you not know what a "steady state" IS? A steady state is a constant solution to the differential equation. And if it is constant, $\frac{du*}{dt}= 0$
So $\frac{du*}{dt}= 0= u*(1- u*)(1+ u*)- Eu*$.

Solve that third degree equation for u*.
 
Country Boy said:
Do you not know what a "steady state" IS? A steady state is a constant solution to the differential equation. And if it is constant, $\frac{du*}{dt}= 0$
So $\frac{du*}{dt}= 0= u*(1- u*)(1+ u*)- Eu*$.

Solve that third degree equation for u*.
Cheers, it was the wording of the question I struggled with, because it said as a function of E. So this is what I did:

\[ Eu*=u*(1-u*)(1+u*) \]
\[ E=(1-u*)(1+u*) \]
\[ ∴u*=1-E, u*=E-1 \]

I think that u*=0 would be a solution, but I'm not sure with the wording of "function of E" what it wants me to do, cheers
 
Then you should have said, in your first post, that your difficulty was with solving the cubic equation, not with the "steady state" of the differential equation! I am concerned that, in a problem involving differential equations, your difficulty is with solving a quadratic equation! In fact, your difficulty is with solving an equation of the form "$x^2= a$".

Yes, Eu*= u*(1- u*)(1+ u*). u*= 0 is a solution. If u* is not 0 we can divide by u* to get E= (1- u*)(1+ u*).

But that does NOT give u*= 1- E or u*= 1+ E as solutions! You would have seen that if you had checked: If u*= 1- E then 1- u*= 1-1+ E= E and 1+ E= 2- E. $(1- u*)(1+ u*)= E(2- E)= 2E- E^2$.

From $E= (1- u*)(1+ u*)= 1- u*^2$ we get $u*^2= 1- E$ so that $u*= \pm\sqrt{1- E}$.
 
Country Boy said:
Then you should have said, in your first post, that your difficulty was with solving the cubic equation, not with the "steady state" of the differential equation! I am concerned that, in a problem involving differential equations, your difficulty is with solving a quadratic equation! In fact, your difficulty is with solving an equation of the form "$x^2= a$".

Yes, Eu*= u*(1- u*)(1+ u*). u*= 0 is a solution. If u* is not 0 we can divide by u* to get E= (1- u*)(1+ u*).

But that does NOT give u*= 1- E or u*= 1+ E as solutions! You would have seen that if you had checked: If u*= 1- E then 1- u*= 1-1+ E= E and 1+ E= 2- E. $(1- u*)(1+ u*)= E(2- E)= 2E- E^2$.

From $E= (1- u*)(1+ u*)= 1- u*^2$ we get $u*^2= 1- E$ so that $u*= \pm\sqrt{1- E}$.

Meaning therefore we have 3 steady state solutions?
\[ u*=0 \]
\[ u*=sqrt(1-E) \]
\[ u*=-sqrt(1-E) \]

Thanks for your help by the way
 
Yes.
 
Country Boy said:
Yes.
Thanks, do you know much about how you would interpret relevant steady states? So the steady state equation was about an animal population. If a steady state is 0 is this indicating that there's no population? and the negative square root steady state is indicating a decline in the population?
 
mt91 said:
Thanks, do you know much about how you would interpret relevant steady states? So the steady state equation was about an animal population. If a steady state is 0 is this indicating that there's no population?
The population is u(t). If for any t, u(t)= 0, there is no population so, of course, it cannot decrease and is not going to increase so stays 0. 0 is always a "steady state" for a population. (Unless you allow "spontaneous generation"!)

and the negative square root steady state is indicating a decline in the population?
No, the whole point of "steady state" is that it is steady, it is NOT changing, neither decreasing nor increasing. A negative value here is a mathematically a solution to the equation but is not a realistic solution- the number of animals cannot be negative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K