MHB How do we expand fractions to make their denominators the same for subtraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobisaka
  • Start date Start date
bobisaka
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In step 3, how did the fractions come to multiplying with those particular numbers?

View attachment 9462
 

Attachments

  • math.png
    math.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 118
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We expand the fractions in that way so that the two fractions get the same denominator, in order to be able to calculate the subtraction, since it is not possible to subtract fractions with different denominators.

The denominator of the first fraction is $6$ and the of the second one it is $9$. We expand both fractions to make their denominators the same as the least common denominator.

The Least Common Multiple of $6$ and $9$ is $18$. It holds that $6\cdot 3=18$ and $9\cdot 2=18$. Therefore we expand the first fraction by $3$ : $\frac{11}{6}=\frac{11\cdot 3}{6\cdot 3}=\frac{33}{18}$ and the second fraction by $2$: $\frac{7}{9}=\frac{7\cdot 2}{9\cdot 2}=\frac{14}{18}$.

Now we can do the subtraction by subtracting the numerators: $$\frac{11}{6}-\frac{7}{9}=\frac{33}{18}-\frac{14}{18}=\frac{19}{18}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top