How do we get the expectation value formula?

  • Thread starter Outrageous
  • Start date
  • #1
374
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

<x>= ∫ complex ψ x ψ dx
How do we get this formula? And why must the complex ψ must be placed in front?
Please guide or any link to help,not really understand this makes me difficult to start in quantum mechanics.
Your help is really appreciated. Pls
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
34,273
10,319
How do we get this formula?
Observation, it fits to the measurement results (there are also some theoretical arguments that it cannot be everything, but those are details. The main point is: the theory was constructed to match observations).

And why must the complex ψ must be placed in front?
Do you mean complex conjugation? It does not have to, you multiply complex numbers here.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #3
374
0
Observation, it fits to the measurement results (there are also some theoretical arguments that it cannot be everything, but those are details. The main point is: the theory was constructed to match observations).

Do you mean complex conjugation? It does not have to, you multiply complex numbers here.
Thanks. One more to ask, even schrodinger equation is also constructed to match observation?
 
  • #4
44
1
Thanks. One more to ask, even schrodinger equation is also constructed to match observation?
All of physics is - observation, plus mathematical consistency (and a certain degree of "taste").

You can derive the Schrodinger equation from some more basic assumptions: that physical states are elements in a vector space, and that time evolution acts on that vector space as a unitary transformation. Then given the relation between energy and time in classical physics, the Schrodinger equation follows.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #5
374
0
All of physics is - observation, plus mathematical consistency (and a certain degree of "taste").

You can derive the Schrodinger equation from some more basic assumptions: that physical states are elements in a vector space, and that time evolution acts on that vector space as a unitary transformation. Then given the relation between energy and time in classical physics, the Schrodinger equation follows.
Thanks~ Do you have any link or book recommended for the derivation mentioned?
 
  • #6
44
1
Chapter 3 of Ballentine is OK. There are probably better references (overall that book isn't very good), but that's the only one I can think of off the top of my head.
 
  • #7
374
0
Chapter 3 of Ballentine is OK. There are probably better references (overall that book isn't very good), but that's the only one I can think of off the top of my head.
Thanks, I try to check it out^^
 
  • #8
DrClaude
Mentor
7,269
3,424
How do we get this formula?
There is also an analogy to probability theory, based on the Born rule that ##\psi^* \psi## is a probability distribution. The expression of the quantum-mechanical expectation value
$$
\langle \hat{A} \rangle = \int \psi^* \hat{A} \psi d\tau
$$
is analogous to the expectation value for a continuous random variable
$$
E[X] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x f(x) dx
$$
especially in the case you mention where you want ##\langle x \rangle## for ##\psi(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #9
9,375
2,429
You might be interested in checking out Gleason's Theorem:
http://kof.physto.se/theses/helena-master.pdf [Broken]

For the basis of Schrodinger's Equation see (as has already been mentioned) Chapter 3 - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development:
http://www-dft.ts.infn.it/~resta/fismat/ballentine.pdf

Believe it or not it actually follows from symmetry - strange but true.

Actually so does Classical Mechanics for that matter - and how it is connected to QM is very interesting - see Landau - Mechanics for example.

In fact this is one of the very deep revelations of physics and well worth becoming acquainted with:
http://www.pnas.org/content/93/25/14256.full.pdf

All books on QM suck in their own unique way and its a matter of taste what approach you take to and book you gravitate towards. I personally love Ballentine - to me it was a revelatory book on QM - but opinions vary. Check it out for yourself and make up your own mind.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Related Threads on How do we get the expectation value formula?

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
927
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
817
Replies
1
Views
940
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
569
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
996
Top