Expectation value of energy in TISE

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expectation value of energy in the context of the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE). Participants explore the mathematical formulation and conceptual understanding of how the expectation value is derived and interpreted, including the roles of operators and eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the formulation of expected energy as ∫ψ*Hψ dx, suggesting it would make more sense if ψ were on the right side of H in a different context.
  • Another participant counters that the relationship Eψ = Hψ does not imply E = H, using a counterexample involving an eigenvalue equation to illustrate the distinction between operators and constants.
  • It is noted that E is a constant and can be factored out of the integral, leading to the expression ∫ψ*Hψ dx = E∫ψ*ψ dx, but the implications of this are debated.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the normalization of the wave function and the meaning of the expectation value of energy, questioning the interpretation of H as a function versus an operator.
  • Clarification is provided that H is an operator that transforms one function into another, and the expectation value of energy is defined as ∫ψ*Hψ dx, where H is the Hermitian operator corresponding to energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the expectation value of energy and the roles of operators and eigenvalues. There is no consensus reached, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the foundational understanding of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants indicate a need for further mathematical background, such as linear algebra and differential equations, to fully grasp the concepts being discussed. There are also unresolved questions about the normalization of wave functions and the nature of operators in quantum mechanics.

yosimba2000
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
If Eψ = Hψ, then why is expected energy ∫ψ*Hψ dx? It makes more sense if I see the ψ on the right side of H as the ψ in ∫Q(ψ*ψ) dx, where Q is some quantity we want to measure the expectation of.

But if true, then since H is defined as (h2/2m) (d2/dx) + V, then what does it mean to calculate the expectation value of H? H has no argument for the second derivative term.

Or another way is, since Eψ = Hψ, then E = H, then H = (h2/2m) (d2/dx) + V = E. How can you get a number from H if you don't take the derivative of anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yosimba2000 said:
Or another way is, since Eψ = Hψ, then E = H
That doesn't follow at all. For a trivial counterexample, consider the eigenvalue equation ##A\psi=\alpha\psi## where ##\alpha## is a constant and ##A## is the matrix
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
One solution of this equation (there's another one, and you might find it worth your time to try to find it) is ##\alpha=1## and ##\psi=\begin{bmatrix}
1 \\
1
\end{bmatrix}##
but you certainly wouldn't conclude from that that ##A=\alpha##. The Schrödinger equation is similar - on one side you have an operator acting on a function, and on the other side you have a constant multiplying that function, and solving it is a matter of finding a function and a constant that makes the two sides come out equal.

If Eψ = Hψ, then why is expected energy ∫ψ*Hψ dx? It makes more sense if I see the ψ on the right side of H as the ψ in ∫Q(ψ*ψ) dx, where Q is some quantity we want to measure the expectation of.
##E## is just a constant so we can take it out of the integral. We have:
$$\int\psi^*H\psi dx = \int\psi^*E\psi dx = E\int\psi^*\psi dx$$
where I used the fact that ##E## and ##\psi## are solutions of the Schrödinger equation in the first step. Now, what is the value of ##\int\psi^*\psi dx##?

If this does not all make sense to you now, you may need a bit more math before you take on quantum mechanics. You'll need some linear algebra and differential equations beyond what's usually taught in first-semester intro classes.
 
Nugatory said:
That doesn't follow at all. For a trivial counterexample, consider the eigenvalue equation ##A\psi=\alpha\psi## where ##\alpha## is a constant and ##A## is the matrix
\begin{bmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; 0<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />
One solution of this equation (there's another one, and you might find it worth your time to try to find it) is ##\alpha=1## and ##\psi=\begin{bmatrix}
1 \\
1
\end{bmatrix}##
but you certainly wouldn't conclude from that that ##A=\alpha##. The Schrödinger equation is similar - on one side you have an operator acting on a function, and on the other side you have a constant multiplying that function, and solving it is a matter of finding a function and a constant that makes the two sides come out equal.##E## is just a constant so we can take it out of the integral. We have:
$$\int\psi^*H\psi dx = \int\psi^*E\psi dx = E\int\psi^*\psi dx$$
where I used the fact that ##E## and ##\psi## are solutions of the Schrödinger equation in the first step. Now, what is the value of ##\int\psi^*\psi dx##?

If this does not all make sense to you now, you may need a bit more math before you take on quantum mechanics. You'll need some linear algebra and differential equations beyond what's usually taught in first-semester intro classes.

I'm not far in linear algebra but I've taken Calc1-3 and Diff Eq, so I don't quite get eigenvalues, or that example. ##\int\psi^*\psi dx## should be 1, or it would be if it was normalized. How do we know if it is normalized right now?

But I'm still not understanding why expectation of energy is ∫ψ*H(ψ) dx. So H is supposed to be a function, and its input is ψ, right? So if Eψ = H(ψ), then energy should be E = H(ψ)/ψ, and expected energy would be <E> = ∫(ψ*ψ)(H(ψ)/ψ) dx?
 
yosimba2000 said:
So H is supposed to be a function, and its input is ψ, right?
H is an operator, something whose input is one function and whose output is another function. When we're solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation, we looking for a function ##\psi(x)## and a number ##E## such that if we provide the function ##\psi(x)## as input to the operator ##H##, the operator will output the function ##E\psi(x)##.

The first step in evaluating the integral in your first post is to replace ##H\psi## with whatever function is the output of ##H## when the input is ##\psi(x)##. That leaves you an integrand that is just a function of ##x## so you can do the integration over ##dx##.
yosimba2000 said:
But I'm still not understanding why expectation of energy is ∫ψ*H(ψ) dx.
The expectation value of any observable, including energy, is given by ##\int \psi^*\hat{O}\psi## where ##\hat{O}## is the Hermitian operator corresponding to that observable. The Hamiltonian is that operator for energy.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K