If we use the Weyl representation the solutions to the Dirac equation turn out to be eigenfunctions of the S(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); ^{3}operator with eigenvalues 1/2 and -1/2, so we say that the field has spin 1/2.

But what about other fields? Why do we say the scalar real and complex field have spin 0? I tried following the same approach and see if their solutions are eigenfunctions of that operator, but I don't know how to do it.

And side question (should I open another thread?): why is the spin related to their statistics? Everything I've read so far just shows that using commutation relations in the Dirac field quantization gives rise to a non positive-definite hamiltonian, whereas using anticommutation relations doesn't. Then they show that commutators imply Bose-Einstein statistics and anticommutators imply Dirac-Fermi statistics.

In light of this it seems that if the field has integer spin we must use commutators, and if it has half-integer spin we must use anticommutators, but nobody goes on to explain why this is.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I How do we know the spin of a field?

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**