How do we parallel transport a vector?

Click For Summary
Parallel transport of a vector along a curve c(τ) is defined by the condition ∇_V X = 0, which can be expressed in components as a differential equation involving the Christoffel symbols. To find the parallel transported vector X^(α)(τ) from an initial vector X^(α)(τ₀), one must solve the initial-value problem derived from the parallel transport condition. The equation for the change in components is given by dX^(α)/dτ = -Γ^(α)_(μν)(dx^(μ)/dτ)X^(ν)(τ), which indicates how the vector changes with respect to the affine parameter τ. While the right-hand side of this equation depends on X, making it implicitly defined, numerical integration methods can be employed to solve it. Ultimately, this process highlights that parallel transport is fundamentally a differential equation rather than a straightforward integral.
pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Given a curve c(τ) with tangent vector V, a vector field X is parallel transported along c if

\nabla_V X=0

at each point along c. Let x^\mu(\tau) denote the coordinates of the curve c. In components the parallel transport condition is

\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}\left(\partial_\mu X^\alpha + {\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu}X^\nu\right)=0

If we are given a vector X^\alpha(\tau_0) of the tangent space at c(\tau_0), how do we obtain the parallel transported vector X^\alpha(\tau) for finite \tau-\tau_0? Clearly it will be an integral taken along c but what is the form of that integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rewrite your equation using the chain rule as

\frac{d X^\alpha}{d \tau} = -{\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu} \frac{d x^\mu}{d\tau} X^\nu(\tau)

This tells you how the components of the vector ##X## change if you parallel transport it along an infinitesimal increment in the affine parameter ##\tau##. You have to integrate up these changes to get the change when you change ##\tau## by a finite amount. Unfortunately the right hand side depends on ##X## so if you actually write down the integral you get an equation that only determines ##X^\alpha(\tau)## implicitly. It would be straightforward to do the integral numerically, though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Given a manifold ##M##, a derivative operator ##\nabla## on ##M##, a smooth curve ##\gamma: I\subseteq \mathbb{R} \rightarrow M## with tangent ##V##, and a tensor ##T_0## at some point ##\gamma(s_0)##, there exists a unique tensor field ##T## on ##\gamma## such that ##\nabla_{V}T = 0## and ##T(\gamma(s_0)) = T_0## i.e. ##T_0## is parallel transported along ##\gamma## with respect to ##\nabla##. This statement can be proven by choosing a set of local coordinates and invoking the uniqueness and existence theorem for ODEs.

To actually find ##T##, you just solve the ODE initial-value problem you get from the parallel transport condition (the initial value being ##T(\gamma(s_0)) = T_0##) by choosing a set of local coordinates. So for example in the case of a vector ##X##, you have ##\frac{dX^{\mu}}{ds} + \Gamma ^{\mu}_{\nu\gamma}V^{\nu}X^{\gamma} = 0 ##. This is an ODE that you can (in principle) solve.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
pellman, Please note that the way The Duck writes it:
\frac{d X^\alpha}{d \tau} = -{\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu} \frac{d x^\mu}{d\tau} X^\nu(\tau)
is the ONLY way to write the condition. What you wrote:
\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}\left(\partial_\mu X^\alpha + {\Gamma^\alpha}_{\mu\nu}X^\nu\right)=0
is a logical impossibility. Inside the parenthesis you have written ∂μXα as if Xα was a field, a function of four variables, so that you could take its four-dimensional gradient. It's only a function of one variable τ, and only defined along a single worldline.

You have to integrate up these changes to get the change when you change ##\tau## by a finite amount. Unfortunately the right hand side depends on ##X## so if you actually right down the integral you get an equation that only determines ##X^\alpha(\tau)## implicitly. It would be straightforward to do the integral numerically, though.
In other words, it's not an integral, it's a differential equation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K